Editing Talk:Monado Arts
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
== Freeze frames explanation == | == Freeze frames explanation == | ||
This is not merely a result of the higher or lower sustained damage, as can be told by two observations. Firstly, Shulk will be in SHS for a different amount of time than the attacker, despite the fact that a simple damage increase substituted into the formula would not have this affect. Secondly, the smash art also affects the amount of freeze frames Shulk sustains, even though it has no effect on sustained damage (which is what normally determines freeze frames). [[User:Alex | This is not merely a result of the higher or lower sustained damage, as can be told by two observations. Firstly, Shulk will be in SHS for a different amount of time than the attacker, despite the fact that a simple damage increase substituted into the formula would not have this affect. Secondly, the smash art also affects the amount of freeze frames Shulk sustains, even though it has no effect on sustained damage (which is what normally determines freeze frames). [[User:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex Parpotta'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex Parpotta|<span style="color: red;">'''flying lobster!'''</span>]] 07:05, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
:As the one who keeps this page in check, could you simplify that explanation? Because I haven't seen the term "Sustained Damage" anywhere else, and do not understand what you are trying to explain. Do you mean hitstun? [[User:Archrelico|Archrelico]] ([[User talk:Archrelico|talk]]) 12:39, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | :As the one who keeps this page in check, could you simplify that explanation? Because I haven't seen the term "Sustained Damage" anywhere else, and do not understand what you are trying to explain. Do you mean hitstun? [[User:Archrelico|Archrelico]] ([[User talk:Archrelico|talk]]) 12:39, 8 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
== The Monado Arts tech pages are a bit much, can we merge them? == | == The Monado Arts tech pages are a bit much, can we merge them? == | ||
Back in March of this year, Omega Tyrant rightfully brought up the unnecessary Crownerang tech pages, see [[Talk:Crownerang|here]]. Two solutions were brought up; a Crownerang/Techniques page, or merging them all to the page itself. I | Back in March of this year, Omega Tyrant rightfully brought up the unnecessary Crownerang tech pages, see [[Talk:Crownerang|here]]. Two solutions were brought up; a Crownerang/Techniques page, or merging them all to the page itself. I see a similar issue with Monado Arts, and it's arguably worse given the complex acronyms some of these use which makes it hard for the uninitiated to read without having multiple tabs up. In other words, the issue here is that the information is quite scattered and difficult to follow, much like the problems the Crownerang techniques had. Some pages don't even have the full list of techniques in "see also", and some like Monado Art Landing Lag Cancel imply the need for other techniques, as well as have abbreviations without prior unabbreviation, it's all very difficult to follow. Unifying these with more precise explanations would make everything much easier to work with. | ||
So, the proposal here is essentially "merge the tech pages, give them all a cleanup while you're at it". | So, the proposal here is essentially "merge the tech pages, give them all a cleanup while you're at it". | ||
