Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
| |
|
| I believe they should be seperate articles. Considering they have notable differences, and it may be confusing for some people. After all, isn't this why we have a disambiguation page? ([[User:Lavaris|Lavaris]] 20:12, February 6, 2008 (EST)) | | I believe they should be seperate articles. Considering they have notable differences, and it may be confusing for some people. After all, isn't this why we have a disambiguation page? ([[User:Lavaris|Lavaris]] 20:12, February 6, 2008 (EST)) |
| :Well the diferences arent much:
| |
| Fox's Landmaster: Balanced, normal to control and balanced knockack between all three lasdmaster
| |
| Wolf's Landmaster: Have more power /(% power), but it doesnt hover as fast as the otherone (a sentence can be made to note the color diference)
| |
| Falco's Landamster: Its hovering is easy to control and can go up enough to KO someone on the top of the landmaster.
| |
|
| |
| It isnt to much diference and other characters that share moves (mostly the ones that have the extacly same move with same name, even having different properties (i.e [[Super Jump Punch]] and [[Triforce Slash]])) share the same article.--[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 20:27, February 6, 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Si. Though they are different, it isn't enough to seperate articles. As previously mentioned, the Super Jump Punch article, Trifore Slash article, they are all examples. I need more people to agree with this before it is done, so...--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] 15:38, February 7, 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| See [[Wolfen]]. I merged the trophy article. Isn't there anyway to merge the three Landmaster articles in the same format, with pictures? If so, I'm all for it. ([[User:Lavaris|Lavaris]] 18:12, February 7, 2008 (EST))
| |
| :A piture of Falco Landmaster isnt nessesary, its graphically the same as fox, we would just need Fox's and Wolf's landmaster pictures to show the differences in colors and then explain the different properties of each finals smash.--[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 19:21, February 7, 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I agree with that. Does this mean they will be in that format? I have a picture of Wolf's Landmaster. ([[User:Lavaris|Lavaris]] 19:34, February 7, 2008 (EST))
| |
| :What do you mean with "by that format"?--[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 20:41, February 7, 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| Will the articles be added as a seperate headline? ([[User:Lavaris|Lavaris]] 15:49, February 8, 2008 (EST))
| |
| :Not nessesary, we just merge the other two with Fox's Landmaster articles, whcih already have the general description of the landmaster and we use differents paragraphs to descrive each Landmaster's properties. all of this would have been more simple if at least one of the two would hve got a different final smash...--[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 19:10, February 8, 2008 (EST)
| |
| ::I think we all agree. Let's move all of the information, and I'll merge them all. But one more thing: I say we take a final vote Merge? '''yes''' or '''no'''? I say '''yes'''.--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] 16:56, February 10, 2008 (EST)
| |
| :::'''yes'''--[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 18:36, February 10, 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ::::Ok if no one have something to say I will merge them now.--[[User:Fandangox|Fandangox]] 23:33, February 13, 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| I guess merge...([[User:Lavaris|Lavaris]] 23:38, February 13, 2008 (EST))
| |