Editing Talk:Clone characters
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::::Marth was never a primary character and Ness was only primary in melee, therefore it shouldn't be any other way. A clone is the character that came second to the origional. [[User:Alexbarker116|Alexbarker116]] 20:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ::::Marth was never a primary character and Ness was only primary in melee, therefore it shouldn't be any other way. A clone is the character that came second to the origional. [[User:Alexbarker116|Alexbarker116]] 20:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::So would you also say that Fox in Melee should be considered Falco's clone since Falco's moveset was introduced on Fox first in SSB? Because really the only difference is the change of identity. Ike and Lucas are the headliners, and unlike Falco, are the main character's of their games to boot. And yes, Marth ''was'' the primary character in Brawl since Roy is considered his clone-- that makes Roy secondary. Look at it this way, Falco was the clone because his character was a lesser representative than Fox (who was the headliner). In Brawl, Marth and Ness are the lesser representatives and they have to be unlocked, doesn't that make them a little more like Falco and Roy who were considered the clones? --[[User:Bman87301|Bman87301]] 22:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | :::::So would you also say that Fox in Melee should be considered Falco's clone since Falco's moveset was introduced on Fox first in SSB? Because really the only difference is the change of identity. Ike and Lucas are the headliners, and unlike Falco, are the main character's of their games to boot. And yes, Marth ''was'' the primary character in Brawl since Roy is considered his clone-- that makes Roy secondary. Look at it this way, Falco was the clone because his character was a lesser representative than Fox (who was the headliner). In Brawl, Marth and Ness are the lesser representatives and they have to be unlocked, doesn't that make them a little more like Falco and Roy who were considered the clones? | ||
--[[User:Bman87301|Bman87301]] 22:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Clones are defined by moveset. Falco was a clone because his moveset was based off of Fox's. So Lucas, if anything, iks a semi-clone of Ness simply because Ness had those attacks first. It has nothing to do with who appears first in the individual game. [[User:Gargomon251|Gargomon251]] 22:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ::::::Clones are defined by moveset. Falco was a clone because his moveset was based off of Fox's. So Lucas, if anything, iks a semi-clone of Ness simply because Ness had those attacks first. It has nothing to do with who appears first in the individual game. [[User:Gargomon251|Gargomon251]] 22:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
