Editing Talk:Bowser (PM)
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections? == | == Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections? == | ||
I ask this because I feel some pages, {{PM|Bowser}} in particular, are becoming or are at risk of becoming too long because of the "Revisions" sections. I feel that the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" section is sufficient enough to demonstrate changes. To me, it seems most of the "significant" info that comes with each version of ''Project M'' is covered in the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" anyway. Besides that, a lot of the "Revisions" stuff becomes outdated as new versions of ''Project M'' come out. On top of that, in my opinion, the "Revisions" stuff really isn't too interesting or helpful. ''Project M'' probably has all that info on their site. Does anyone agree with me? | I ask this because I feel some pages, {{PM|Bowser}} in particular, are becoming or are at risk of becoming too long because of the "Revisions" sections. I feel that the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" section is sufficient enough to demonstrate changes. To me, it seems most of the "significant" info that comes with each version of ''Project M'' is covered in the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" anyway. Besides that, a lot of the "Revisions" stuff becomes outdated as new versions of ''Project M'' come out. On top of that, in my opinion, the "Revisions" stuff really isn't too interesting or helpful. ''Project M'' probably has all that info on their site. Does anyone agree with me? | ||
