Editing Smasher talk:CPU

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
This is a talk page. Remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) and follow the talk page policy.
Warning You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Wait, that's it?  He played at this one tournament, and then vanished?  This article seems pretty sparse of info. --[[Special:Contributions/160.39.188.134|160.39.188.134]] 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Wait, that's it?  He played at this one tournament, and then vanished?  This article seems pretty sparse of info. --[[Special:Contributions/160.39.188.134|160.39.188.134]] 16:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
:He beat Ken at Evo 2008, thanks to the dumb idea that items should be on medium.  He abused ROBs final smash en route to a rather controversial victory over Ken Hoang.  Once items were banned in tourneys, he has made no noticeable impact to my knowledge.  [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 17:33, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 


Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill [[User:JtM|JtM =^&#93;]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Items were also used at EVO.thats not skill [[User:JtM|JtM =^&#93;]] ([[User talk:JtM|talk]]) 20:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Line 7: Line 7:


Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. [[User:Capefeather|capefeather]] ([[User talk:Capefeather|talk]]) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Should there be a note concerning all the controversy CPU has gotten for beating Ken in a VERY controversial tournament? Also, I don't think the stages of the matches matter. [[User:Capefeather|capefeather]] ([[User talk:Capefeather|talk]]) 21:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't think CPU should've been on here, the only reason he beaten Ken was because he abused the Final Smash and items, and that's not skill it's a skill that noobs only use. If there was no items, Ken would've won, there might've also been a possible chance that he wouldn't have retiredfrom Super Smash Bros.--[[User:Ryou Seiji|Ryou Seiji]] ([[User talk:Ryou Seiji|talk]]) 14:58, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
:This is arguable. While CPU did abuse items, he abused them well. What I'm saying is, despite how over-powered the items are, CPU didn't win through chance. I agree Ken would have won without items, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Ken should be considered more skilled. It's like saying that a Meta Knight player would have won in a tourney if Norfair was legal, so he is more skilled than the other player who beat him. [[Special:Contributions/124.171.84.193|124.171.84.193]] 02:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to SmashWiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see SmashWiki:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)