SmashWiki:Requests for rollback/Defiant Elements

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Archive.png This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.
Result: Rollback granted. Miles (talk) 03:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Defiant Elements[edit]

I have a tendency to spend a great deal of time patrolling Recent Changes when I'm bored/at work which in turn leads me to spend a decent amount of time reverting vandalism, etc. As most of you can probably tell, I take wikis reasonably seriously and I've been editing them for two or three years now and I've also worked in administrative capacities on several other successful wikis. That said, I (like everyone else, in all honesty) don't need Rollback, per se, but it would be useful/convenient/etc. – Defiant Elements +talk 04:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Votes/Comments[edit]

  • Slight support. Although I disagree with some of your personality traits (overly serious, not very understanding), there is no doubt in my mind that Defiant Elements would use rollback well. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 05:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Why do people keep saying serious is a bad thing? :/ --Shadowcrest 21:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, some srs bsns is a good thing, but too much of it can get annoying. But CH made a good point in that srs bsns is the best way to go when editing articles and undoing vandalism. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 01:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Support. Nothing wrong with seriousness when it comes to janitorial work. In fact, it's encouraged. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 05:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • What C. Hawk said --Shadowcrest 19:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Same as CHawk. I'm Alex25, King of Randomness! Say Hi to me! Random stuff, Mah boi! 20:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong Support. "You're active, and you're not a vandal. IMO, those are the only things that matter." --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 20:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Perfect anti-vandal. I don't know what other qualifications are really needed for this position. Miles (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. One of the best vandal fighters on this wiki. Why didn't you run sooner? Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 21:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Yeah, everybody else.SmoreKing Happy Holidays! 22:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. Pretty much... ParaGoomba348 03:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. You've got what it takes. Also, per Fried Beef. Koopa Claus Happy Holidays 03:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Mate, they'd have to be mad not to give you rollback. Heck, I'd support you if you ran for admin! Support! --Toon GanondorfCHAT 05:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support. What everyone else has said. --GutripperSpeak if you are worthy 05:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Mild support. Cheez could not have said it better. Baltro [ talk ] 00:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)