Template talk:SubspaceArmy: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I really can't say which I think would be better. I say do whichever.[[User:Entrea Sumatae|<span style="color:#4682b4">'''–Entrea Sumatae'''</span>]] 22:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | I really can't say which I think would be better. I say do whichever.[[User:Entrea Sumatae|<span style="color:#4682b4">'''–Entrea Sumatae'''</span>]] 22:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
I'll leave them because then they can see the title of the page and the picture/infobox at the top without being shunted further down. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|5280s]] <small>([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Miles.oppenheimer|contributions]])</small> 02:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:43, September 3, 2008
Should a link like Mr. Game & Watch show up under "other members"? He was being manipulated much like Master Hand or R.O.B. I couldn't quite tell. (For what it's worth, this template shows up on Mr. Game & Watch (SSBB).) 5280s (talk · contributions) 20:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I do believe you are correct. It wasn't exactly the same, but close enough.–Entrea Sumatae 21:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Question #2: Should the the links for Ganondorf, Wario, Bowser, R.O.B. and Mr. Game & Watch follow this pattern: Bowser? Or is the current setup preferable? 5280s (talk · contributions) 22:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I really can't say which I think would be better. I say do whichever.–Entrea Sumatae 22:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I'll leave them because then they can see the title of the page and the picture/infobox at the top without being shunted further down. 5280s (talk · contributions) 02:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
