Talk:Stall-then-fall: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Tis sounds like a good idea. I shall put it in.--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] 20:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | Tis sounds like a good idea. I shall put it in.--[[User:Oxico|Oxico]] 20:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Glitch?== | |||
I don't think that the vertical knockback canceling is a glitch. When a character beings a stall then fall, they begin to fall to the ground extremely fast. However, if they have vertical knockback applied, the two would cancel out. Sometimes one is more prevalent than the other. If attempted multiple times, you will see that the character cancels a different amount of knockback depending on when the attack was begun. If done late enough, the character will even begin to fall. Given that it is simply two forces acting against each other in a measurable way, the property can be explained by the game physics system and is therefore by definition not a glitch. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] 06:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:20, May 7, 2008
Should we include Bowser's, Kirby's and Yoshi's down B in this article? These moves also stall-then-fall.Timothyung 15:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Tis sounds like a good idea. I shall put it in.--Oxico 20:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Glitch?
I don't think that the vertical knockback canceling is a glitch. When a character beings a stall then fall, they begin to fall to the ground extremely fast. However, if they have vertical knockback applied, the two would cancel out. Sometimes one is more prevalent than the other. If attempted multiple times, you will see that the character cancels a different amount of knockback depending on when the attack was begun. If done late enough, the character will even begin to fall. Given that it is simply two forces acting against each other in a measurable way, the property can be explained by the game physics system and is therefore by definition not a glitch. Clarinet Hawk 06:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
