Talk:Off Wave: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::::"Sins"? Hey, it's a game, chill out. If there's something that a good majority of smashers would say, "That's nice, but who gives a $#!%?" to, then it's a sign that it's too trivial. '''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 06:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | :::::"Sins"? Hey, it's a game, chill out. If there's something that a good majority of smashers would say, "That's nice, but who gives a $#!%?" to, then it's a sign that it's too trivial. '''[[User:Silverdragon706|FyreNWater]]''' - <small>([[User talk:Silverdragon706|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|Contributions]] )</small> 06:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::::It may be a game, but it's also a symptom of the disease Wikipedia has infected most of its spinoffs with; we have infinite space on this wonderful series of tubes called the Internet, no reason to destroy information like the ones who burned the Library of Alexandria. Wookieepedia doesn't worry about triviality, for God's sake, they have an article on Jean-Luc Picard based on one tiny magazine article! We should follow their example. [[User:Thanos6|Thanos6]] 07:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ::::::It may be a game, but it's also a symptom of the disease Wikipedia has infected most of its spinoffs with; we have infinite space on this wonderful series of tubes called the Internet, no reason to destroy information like the ones who burned the Library of Alexandria. Wookieepedia doesn't worry about triviality, for God's sake, they have an article on Jean-Luc Picard based on one tiny magazine article! We should follow their example. [[User:Thanos6|Thanos6]] 07:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::::I think that would be more applicable to wikis of individual universes involved in Brawl rather than this wiki with the exception of user-based or user discovered hacks since the series is pretty concrete. [[User:Enzeru|Enzeru]] 11:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:13, April 22, 2008
No such thing as too trivial. This is why broke off from Wikipedia in the first place. Thanos6 17:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Um, no. There are things that are too trivial and unimportant for their own page, like "Peach's Vegetable With the Stichface" or "Luigi's Misfiring Coin Jump Punch". FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 02:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. Those aren't too trivial either. Thanos6 04:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, they are. Both articles are actual ones that have been deleted for being trivial. I personally deleted that turnip one twice. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 04:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- *shakes my head sadly* We move away from Wikipedia because they'd delete these things as too trivial...and then we start doing it here, too. And so the sins of one generation repeat themselves unto the next... Thanos6 05:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- There's a point where it is too trivial, when it would make more sense as a sentence or two on another page, otherwise people just waste their time moving around. Both examples above are good examples. -Ashran111 05:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- "Sins"? Hey, it's a game, chill out. If there's something that a good majority of smashers would say, "That's nice, but who gives a $#!%?" to, then it's a sign that it's too trivial. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 06:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- It may be a game, but it's also a symptom of the disease Wikipedia has infected most of its spinoffs with; we have infinite space on this wonderful series of tubes called the Internet, no reason to destroy information like the ones who burned the Library of Alexandria. Wookieepedia doesn't worry about triviality, for God's sake, they have an article on Jean-Luc Picard based on one tiny magazine article! We should follow their example. Thanos6 07:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think that would be more applicable to wikis of individual universes involved in Brawl rather than this wiki with the exception of user-based or user discovered hacks since the series is pretty concrete. Enzeru 11:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- It may be a game, but it's also a symptom of the disease Wikipedia has infected most of its spinoffs with; we have infinite space on this wonderful series of tubes called the Internet, no reason to destroy information like the ones who burned the Library of Alexandria. Wookieepedia doesn't worry about triviality, for God's sake, they have an article on Jean-Luc Picard based on one tiny magazine article! We should follow their example. Thanos6 07:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- *shakes my head sadly* We move away from Wikipedia because they'd delete these things as too trivial...and then we start doing it here, too. And so the sins of one generation repeat themselves unto the next... Thanos6 05:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, they are. Both articles are actual ones that have been deleted for being trivial. I personally deleted that turnip one twice. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 04:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. Those aren't too trivial either. Thanos6 04:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
