Talk:Event 14: Sproutrage of the Flower Pikmin: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | :::OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:23, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | ::::Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:23, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::::I disagree. Linking everything possible makes articles more cluttered. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 14:30, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
::::::Explain. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:32, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
:::::::Having too many links causes the reader to be distracted. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REPEATLINK#Repeated_links if the first link in an infobox (like this scenario), it's fine], but don't use too many repeated links. [[User:Mr. Anon|Mr. Anon]] ([[User talk:Mr. Anon|talk]]) 14:37, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
::::::::Whenever possible would mean that it should be used so long as it doesn't repeat itself after infobox usage. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough. <span style="font-family:Forte">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]][[User:Megatron1/Laughology|<span style="color:blue">XD</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px|:p]] 14:39, 14 May 2011 (EDT) | |||
==Mistitled?== | |||
Is this event meant to be spelled 'sproutrage' or 'sproutage?' I can't access my Brawl disc at the moment to check. I'm gonna guess that it's 'sproutage' because 'sproutrage' isn't a word. --[[User:VeePickle|VeePickle]] ([[User talk:VeePickle|talk]]) 19:39, 3 December 2013 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:39, December 3, 2013
Double linking[edit]
In case you haven't noticed, many articles link again if it is only in the infobox. MegaTron1XD
14:10, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Doesn't mean those articles have the "correct" style. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- It's generally agreed that it is ok to have a double link like so. Unless you plan on suggesting that all double links be removed, avoid removing double links. MegaTron1XD
14:21, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". MegaTron1XD 14:23, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- I disagree. Linking everything possible makes articles more cluttered. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- Links should be used whenever possible to make the Wiki more "connected". MegaTron1XD
- OK then. But I still don't see why they are necessary. Mr. Anon (talk) 14:22, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
- It's generally agreed that it is ok to have a double link like so. Unless you plan on suggesting that all double links be removed, avoid removing double links. MegaTron1XD
Mistitled?[edit]
Is this event meant to be spelled 'sproutrage' or 'sproutage?' I can't access my Brawl disc at the moment to check. I'm gonna guess that it's 'sproutage' because 'sproutrage' isn't a word. --VeePickle (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2013 (EST)
