Talk:Double jump: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:it's a crime to humanity. o i thought u said "what's wrong" --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | :it's a crime to humanity. o i thought u said "what's wrong" --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | ||
::Ugh. '''No'''. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ::Ugh. '''No'''. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::that doesn't mean you can call people you dont even know a thing about idiots. --[[Special:Contributions/69.12.204.172|The Anonymous]]-- | |||
Revision as of 00:20, October 9, 2008
do we really need speculation on how characters double jump? we dont have an article on how kirby holds items without having fingers. --The Anonymous--
Read. Confirmed is not equal to speculation. Think about it; do we really need IPs with an IQ equivalent in number to my fingers sharing their half-brained opinions? Semicolon (talk) 03:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- ips have feelings too. and this ip has been a member on other wikis, and knows a little bit about harassment. im asking you nicely to leave me alone, please. --The Anonymous--
- if you make an account, then he wont bother you. JtM =^] (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- prejudice strikes at unexpected moments i suppose --The Anonymous--
- Nothing prejudiced about it. I made an edit. You reverted it. Your revert was ill advised. I then judged you. It's not because you're an IP that I found your edit silly, it's because the edit was silly and that I judged you. You can become a valued user on this wiki as an IP. But what was I supposed to refer to you as, a user? That you may be, but a user is a term with semantic complications generally referring to those who have user pages and screen names. You're obviously a person, but to make such a distinction is foolish. The most salient detail was that you operate as an IP. Thus, that is what I called you. Semicolon (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- prejudice=prejudge. meaning u "prejudged" me by calling me dumb.--The Anonymous--
- Nothing prejudiced about it. I made an edit. You reverted it. Your revert was ill advised. I then judged you. It's not because you're an IP that I found your edit silly, it's because the edit was silly and that I judged you. You can become a valued user on this wiki as an IP. But what was I supposed to refer to you as, a user? That you may be, but a user is a term with semantic complications generally referring to those who have user pages and screen names. You're obviously a person, but to make such a distinction is foolish. The most salient detail was that you operate as an IP. Thus, that is what I called you. Semicolon (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- prejudice strikes at unexpected moments i suppose --The Anonymous--
- if you make an account, then he wont bother you. JtM =^] (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
What's the point of just using IP anyway? Cheezperson {talk}stuff 04:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- it's a crime to humanity. o i thought u said "what's wrong" --The Anonymous--
- Ugh. No. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. Semicolon (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- that doesn't mean you can call people you dont even know a thing about idiots. --The Anonymous--
- Ugh. No. Take this vocab lesson. Prejudice is when you have an opinion about someone based on a content-less characteristic, such as race, religion, gender, etc. This is entirely different from a judgment based on something you've done. If I call you an idiot because you're Scientologist or something, even if you aren't an idiot, that's prejudice. If I call you an idiot because you say that, to take an utterly random example, that a fair judgment is prejudice when I've clearly established that there was a contentful reason for the judgment, then that's a fair judgment. Semicolon (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
