SmashWiki talk:About

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Revision as of 15:39, January 1, 2016 by Amber Blackstar (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 156.39.127.199 (talk) to last version by BlindColours.)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Why are there ad's on the page? 97.121.184.176 13:28, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

Because servers aren't free. Get an account and most of them go away. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 15:38, September 23, 2009 (UTC)

Article on SmashWiki itself

So Wikipedia, in addition to having its About page, also has an encyclopedic article on itself. Should we have an article about SW separate from this one? Miles (talk) 21:21, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Not really since we're not that important to the Smash community and Wikipedia is very common and well-known in general, hence why it has its own article on its site.Smoreking(T) (c) 22:58, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Smoreking - we're probably not notable enough. :D PenguinofDeath 23:55, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
Are we just not that notable enough? There are plenty of other reasons that we are notable, but I'm not going to write an essay about them: Here are a few:
  • This is the Smash Bros Wiki, and it is a large community collaboration.
  • We are very active, and continue to expand to become one of the most concise resources for the Super Smash Bros Series. (the reason why new pages, sections, and facts are added constantly)
  • We continue to work on the project to make it easy to use for all (the reason why we all are editing the pages so often).
  • We are easily accessible to anyone (otherwise we wouldn't be one of the first results when you Google Super Smash Bros Brawl)
Any more ideas? RAN1domchupunch!!99 00:40, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
If you're calling Smash Wiki not notable, you're calling the Smash World Forums not notable. Go to their site, and click on link at the top that says "wiki", and guess what site you're directed at. We need to have an article on ourselves. 98.117.158.220 02:35, January 18, 2010 (UTC)