Forum:The Current SSBB List: Difference between revisions
m (Forgot my signature! I'm an idiot...) |
(peeechya) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
I honestly don't understand what they were thinking, so much of it is so wrong in my opinion.They put Snake as number 1 right?I admit he's a good character but top?Snake is easily aerial combo'd into death plus he may have the most projectiles in the game but none of them are diverse or exceptional.I disagree with most of them bottom tiers so I'll put disagree. [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 20:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | I honestly don't understand what they were thinking, so much of it is so wrong in my opinion.They put Snake as number 1 right?I admit he's a good character but top?Snake is easily aerial combo'd into death plus he may have the most projectiles in the game but none of them are diverse or exceptional.I disagree with most of them bottom tiers so I'll put disagree. [[User:Hatake91|Hatake91]] ([[User talk:Hatake91|talk]]) 20:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Gamefaqs = a bunch of hooligans who know even less about smash than we do. It goes Smashboards - Wiki - Gamefaqs in terms of authority. There is no official tier list now, and there will not be an official tier list for a long time, and there may not ever be a concrete tier list. In a gigantic addition, tier lists at this point, like the official [[User:Clarinet Hawk/SLAPAHO Tier List|SLAPAHO tier list]], are more for 'We Called It!' than 'This is it, and We Condemn Anyone Who Disagrees' [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 20:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:57, June 30, 2008
I'm going to hold a poll to see what people think of Gamefaqs' current tier list for Brawl. I'd like for you to state whether you agree or disagree with it. You don't have to give a reason for your choice, but it is strongly encouraged. To be honest, I strongly disagree with the current list. - GalaxiaD (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not even ready to look at that tier list as anything more than group speculation. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 15:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Where is the tier list? Maxiscool (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- It was removed because it is unofficial. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 15:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, I found a link to it. Hmmmmmmmm.... Ugh. This thing is far from perfect. Why are Toon Link, Lucas, Captian Falcon, Pkmn trainer, and Mario so low? Why is Ike so low? Olimar is a little high... I'd move Lucario and Wario down a little... I could go on and on like this, but I'll just strongly disagree with it. Maxiscool (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Running Total
- Agree: 0
- Disagree: 2
GalaxiaD (talk) 16:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
I honestly don't understand what they were thinking, so much of it is so wrong in my opinion.They put Snake as number 1 right?I admit he's a good character but top?Snake is easily aerial combo'd into death plus he may have the most projectiles in the game but none of them are diverse or exceptional.I disagree with most of them bottom tiers so I'll put disagree. Hatake91 (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Gamefaqs = a bunch of hooligans who know even less about smash than we do. It goes Smashboards - Wiki - Gamefaqs in terms of authority. There is no official tier list now, and there will not be an official tier list for a long time, and there may not ever be a concrete tier list. In a gigantic addition, tier lists at this point, like the official SLAPAHO tier list, are more for 'We Called It!' than 'This is it, and We Condemn Anyone Who Disagrees' Semicolon (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
