Cheap: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Undid edit by GarbaldEngrish:, same reason as eralier) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Delete| Not important.}} | |||
<!-- THIS IS SUBJECTIVE, THEREFORE WE WILL NOT LIST EXAMPLES. All examples will be REMOVED. Repeat offenders will face punishment. -->'''Cheap''' is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game. <ref>[http://www.sirlin.net/articles/playing-to-win-part-1.html "Cheap" in ''Playing to Win''], by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.</ref> Because of this, it has no clear meaning. The closest definition is "a strategy that someone can not figure out how to beat" or "a strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship". However, there is usually no rule against these tactics in tournaments because they are subjective. Many times, [[John|players cry cheap about any style that prevents them from performing their top moves or even just prevents them from winning]]. To date, there are no tactics or characters banned in the [[Super Smash Bros. series]] simply for being "cheap". Tactics that truly are so "cheap" that they completely destroy the game are considered [[broken]]. | <!-- THIS IS SUBJECTIVE, THEREFORE WE WILL NOT LIST EXAMPLES. All examples will be REMOVED. Repeat offenders will face punishment. -->'''Cheap''' is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game. <ref>[http://www.sirlin.net/articles/playing-to-win-part-1.html "Cheap" in ''Playing to Win''], by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.</ref> Because of this, it has no clear meaning. The closest definition is "a strategy that someone can not figure out how to beat" or "a strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship". However, there is usually no rule against these tactics in tournaments because they are subjective. Many times, [[John|players cry cheap about any style that prevents them from performing their top moves or even just prevents them from winning]]. To date, there are no tactics or characters banned in the [[Super Smash Bros. series]] simply for being "cheap". Tactics that truly are so "cheap" that they completely destroy the game are considered [[broken]]. | ||
Revision as of 06:28, September 8, 2010
|
This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with the deletion policy. The editor who added this tag believes this page should be deleted for the following reason: " Not important." If you disagree with this page's deletion, please explain why on its talk page. Feel free to edit this page, but it must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed until the discussion is closed. |
Cheap is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game. [1] Because of this, it has no clear meaning. The closest definition is "a strategy that someone can not figure out how to beat" or "a strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship". However, there is usually no rule against these tactics in tournaments because they are subjective. Many times, players cry cheap about any style that prevents them from performing their top moves or even just prevents them from winning. To date, there are no tactics or characters banned in the Super Smash Bros. series simply for being "cheap". Tactics that truly are so "cheap" that they completely destroy the game are considered broken.
See also
References
- ^ "Cheap" in Playing to Win, by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.
