Talk:List of Director's Room Miiverse posts/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Talk:List of Director's Room Miiverse posts/Archive 2 (view source)

Revision as of 16:42, March 1, 2014

1,983 bytes added , 10 years ago

m

no edit summary

Omega Tyrant

Administrators

16,295

edits

@@ Line 94: / Line 94: @@
 ::::Says the supposed admin who right away violated [[SW:1RV]], reverts while not responding on the talk page, and just brushes off the opposition as "making zero justification". It's not an ad hominem, it's calling you out on your shit. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 15:18, 1 March 2014 (EST)
 :::::It's pointless to argue with someone who clearly has no interest in holding a civil discussion; I've made my points clearly. Continuing to re-add this content is in violation of the wiki's standards and policies. I advise you to talk to Toomai if you want this content that badly, because it is not permissible. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 15:26, 1 March 2014 (EST)
+::::::"''It's pointless to argue with someone who clearly has no interest in holding a civil discussion''"
+::::::Again, who violated [[SW:1RV]] first? Who reverted without responding? Who kept brushing off the other side as "putting up no argument", even though they have typed like 10K characters on here? Don't tell me that I "have no interest in holding a civil discussion", when you have been a belittling ass the whole time who can't even abide by the Wiki policies they're trying to trump so hard.
+::::::"''Continuing to re-add this content is in violation of the wiki's standards and policies.''"
+::::::Dude, '''you reverting me was a violation'''. Lets see, you remove a bunch of information, I revert, and do you go to the talkpage to "discuss it civilly"? No, you undo the revert. '''That right there is a blatant violation of [[SW:1RV]].''' Then, after Toomai's post where he states he didn't disagree with the reporting of certain speculation, you don't respond farther, when you posted on other Wiki pages after. So I then rerevert you as it seems you conceded, and what do you do? '''Undo the revert yet again, claimed I "made no argument", and still never bothered to respond back on the talk page'''. Don't you dare throw this "violation of Wiki standards and policies" and "civil discussion" shit in my face when you have blatantly violated them this whole time you hypocrite.
+::::::You don't respond back in an hour, you show you have no refute, and have thus conceded. You don't get to go "oh I'm not going to respond to your argument, but don't add it back or that's a violation!". You want to keep this information off so badly? You refute then. Your behavior here is completely impermissible. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 15:42, 1 March 2014 (EST)
 :Both of you calm down. All I want is the list to be completed. Maybe you can fill out the June and July sections on Archive 1, and then decide on what you want to do with the speculation. The notes don't have to be filled out, so let's not touch them until we make a decision. By the way, Omega, you just gave me an edit conflict! [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 14:42, 1 March 2014 (EST)