Forum:Any other serious anti-tierists out there?: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
The treatise will address any of your substance. As for your challenge to play, the problem is that whether you can beat people with lower tiered characters or not isn't an argument. It doesn't prove anything. Sure, skill does come first. But tiers exist. Those are not mutually exclusive. See, I've earned my salt in tournaments and competitive play both with lower and higher tiered characters, so your point is useless. And please, before you come back, ''if'' you come back, read the treatise. '''Please'''. I wrote it for people like you. Run along now. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | The treatise will address any of your substance. As for your challenge to play, the problem is that whether you can beat people with lower tiered characters or not isn't an argument. It doesn't prove anything. Sure, skill does come first. But tiers exist. Those are not mutually exclusive. See, I've earned my salt in tournaments and competitive play both with lower and higher tiered characters, so your point is useless. And please, before you come back, ''if'' you come back, read the treatise. '''Please'''. I wrote it for people like you. Run along now. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 22:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Sorry about the tildes thing... And I did already read that treatise, in fact, it was most of the reason I posted what I did. It didn't convince me. It just seems silly that in a game, where many, many strategies have yet to be invented and seen, that people can rank each character in any kind of order. Yes, I can admit that there are some characters who are simply not that good when compared to others (so far anyway) and some matchups will favour certain characters, but it seems absurd to place these characters into tiers based on what? A few people (many of whom, the videos I've seen anway, are not even very good) winning with certain characters in tournaments? I firmly believe that a good player will make use of any character, against any character. In fact, I know that if someone were to play a higher tiered character, that they could be easily beaten by any character lower down the list. Until someone proves to me that this current tier list is valid, I will remain skeptical. [[User:KnaveofHearts|KnaveofHearts]] ([[User talk:KnaveofHearts|talk]]) 22:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
