Forum:About unnecessary articles: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I agree with you 100%. Trivial articles should be merged or deleted. - [[User:GalaxiaD|GalaxiaD]] ([[User talk:GalaxiaD|talk]]) 03:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | I agree with you 100%. Trivial articles should be merged or deleted. - [[User:GalaxiaD|GalaxiaD]] ([[User talk:GalaxiaD|talk]]) 03:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Well, I still think The Fish was too cool to be merged, but I do agree with you. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 03:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:25, July 2, 2008
Wikipedia doesn't have an article for, for example, every single Simpsons character. So why do we need entire articles for characters that only appear on a single trophy or sticker? I say unless said characters have a huge storyline and/or impact on their games, such as Midna, there's no reason they can't simply be merged to the game's page or the universe's page. It's really ridiculous to make an article that's a mere two sentences long, half of which simply describes sticker effects. The same should go for many background characters. The Fish article was merged to Summit, I don't see why Pidgit should be much different. - Gargomon251 (talk) 02:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree with you 100%. Trivial articles should be merged or deleted. - GalaxiaD (talk) 03:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, I still think The Fish was too cool to be merged, but I do agree with you. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 03:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)