Editing SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Aidanzapunk
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
#'''Strong oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Because of that, I have to disagree with some people who is supporting for you. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Getting adminship is simply beyond just only dealing with vandalism. You are more of being a janitorial admin if you only deal with vandalism. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. Right now, you don't deserve being an admin in my eyes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 13:45, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Strong oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Because of that, I have to disagree with some people who is supporting for you. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Getting adminship is simply beyond just only dealing with vandalism. You are more of being a janitorial admin if you only deal with vandalism. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. Right now, you don't deserve being an admin in my eyes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 13:45, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
#Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | #Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||
#'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT) |