Editing Forum:Unused template
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Oppose== | ==Oppose== | ||
*'''Oppose.''' For a "specific reason" deletion template to be useful, it should provide a tangible benefit over the general one. This "unused" template is not significantly easier to type, and since the main point of speedy deletion is that an admin doesn't need to think too hard on whether to agree, doing it for the purpose of a separate category isn't very helpful either. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[File:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Loony 07:42, June 14, 2023 (EDT) | *'''Oppose.''' For a "specific reason" deletion template to be useful, it should provide a tangible benefit over the general one. This "unused" template is not significantly easier to type, and since the main point of speedy deletion is that an admin doesn't need to think too hard on whether to agree, doing it for the purpose of a separate category isn't very helpful either. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[File:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Loony 07:42, June 14, 2023 (EDT) | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
It's not a bad template, but it's not really that useful for a shortcut, when typing <nowiki>{{Unused}}</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>{{d|Unused}}</nowiki> only saves typing two characters, is anyone really going to care about having to type an extra two characters on a maintenance template? It also has no additional utility like {{t|Replaced}} and {{t|Duplicate}} do in making it more efficient to link the replacing/duplicate image. I won't oppose it, but I won't support it either, and there is maybe something to be said about avoiding confusing inexperienced users by having excessive deletion templates. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 01:27, June 14, 2023 (EDT) | It's not a bad template, but it's not really that useful for a shortcut, when typing <nowiki>{{Unused}}</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>{{d|Unused}}</nowiki> only saves typing two characters, is anyone really going to care about having to type an extra two characters on a maintenance template? It also has no additional utility like {{t|Replaced}} and {{t|Duplicate}} do in making it more efficient to link the replacing/duplicate image. I won't oppose it, but I won't support it either, and there is maybe something to be said about avoiding confusing inexperienced users by having excessive deletion templates. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 01:27, June 14, 2023 (EDT) |