Editing Forum:Amendment to Smasher Policy (names for notable players)
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
You aren't logged in. While it's not a requirement to create an account, doing so makes it a lot easier to keep track of your edits and a lot harder to confuse you with someone else. If you edit without being logged in, your IP address will be recorded in the page's edit history. | |
 Log in
|
Create account
| |
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Proposals}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | {{Forumheader|Proposals}}{{Proposal}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
In many places across the wiki, there are lists of smasher names that a particular smasher has taken sets from (X has taken sets off players such as A, B, C, D, etc.). Sometimes, a smasher has so many of these that it can spoil the readability of a section to an unreasonable degree. Until recently, I had been trying to enforce a limit of 10 names, which while still probably not very readable in some circumstances, is still, I believe, a far more reasonable standard. Because I was told to stop doing it, it has since snowballed out of control, to the point where there are some pages that now need cleaning up, such as {{Sm|AbsentPage}}'s page which, as of this post, has a whopping 23 names in the second paragraph. | In many places across the wiki, there are lists of smasher names that a particular smasher has taken sets from (X has taken sets off players such as A, B, C, D, etc.). Sometimes, a smasher has so many of these that it can spoil the readability of a section to an unreasonable degree. Until recently, I had been trying to enforce a limit of 10 names, which while still probably not very readable in some circumstances, is still, I believe, a far more reasonable standard. Because I was told to stop doing it, it has since snowballed out of control, to the point where there are some pages that now need cleaning up, such as {{Sm|AbsentPage}}'s page which, as of this post, has a whopping 23 names in the second paragraph. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
