User talk:Zeldasmash/Archive 1

NPOV

Zeldasmash, on SmashWiki, a neutral point of view (NPOV) is supposed to be maintained on articles. The past few edits you've been making here are all subjective, which is why they've been reverted again and again. If you'd like to contest Link's placing in SmashBoard's tier list, you should probably put it in the forums or even on your own user page, instead of adding a point of view which is not neutral to Link's page. Thanks, RAN1 00:37, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

The Preview Button

By hitting the preview button, you can see your progress so far on your user-page and weak and fix it as you see fit. Seriously, use one edit instead on a bunch of mini-ones. HavocReaper48 21:35, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

stop being a huge scrub

use the show preview button because no-one gives a shit about your userpage. All you're doing is cluttering up RC which hardly anyone is using. --Warwick

Watch Your Tone!!

Hey,Warwick!,watch your mouth! I dont respect that kind of tone, so stop complaining about my userpage. If you dont like it, go somewhere else then or take a hike, but stop annoying me please, OK, thank you, i appreciate it. --Zeldasmash

hey bros i can create new sections

sup so anyway yeah I was like thinking any maybe trollfaeces on was a good idea here eh bro eh eh? --Warwick

Let's try this again

1. Warwick, don't troll.
2. Zeldasmash, you've now been asked once and trolled once, and now you'll be warned by a moderator. On Smashwiki, that's hitting for the cycle, and it means you need to actually do what we're asking or we make sure you can't do what you're doing.
3. Warwick, don't troll, or you will get teh banz. Semicolon (talk) 23:08, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

That is all right

Its okay with me, but take it easy on the images. --User:zeldasmash

Just what on Earth does that mean? Semicolon (talk) 23:17, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Speaking of images... BNK ^[E|T|C] 23:31, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

lololololol Semicolon (talk) 23:58, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Your block

I didn't want to do this, and I shouldn'tve had to do this. I can't make this any clearer. Sign. Your. Comments I am going to try a new system on you as well, as your transgressions are relatively minimal but my irritation with you has grown geometrically. Every time you fail to sign your comments (hint, if you forget how to do it, it tells you right above the text window) I will block you for double what I blocked you last time, and perhaps give you a funny name in the unsigned template. I'm done asking, and I'm not going to beg for you to follow basic protocol around here. We're on to action time, so sign your comments. That's the last time I tell you. Henceforth, I'll just block you. Semicolon (talk) 02:54, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Matchups

I would like to add to your comments regarding matchups. The reason why the matchups look like this is due to smashboards people being lazy or due to inactivity on their board in that topic. See for example Luigi who has basically 0 matchups listed. Don't edit things in reference to matchups. I am personally going to smashboards right now and checking with the Luigi matchups to make sure they get finished. Edit: forgot signature --KoRoBeNiKi (talk) 17:26, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

...

Fresh off a block for not signing your posts, you make that edit to the tier list page. I don't care if you think that you are right, we've been over the fact that that is not considered proper editing on this wiki. Your other posts have generally consisted of you adding spaces to articles and then removing them and/or talking about how you think Link should be higher on the tier list even though you can't give any reasons or show empirical evidence to his strengths. I can't make you a better contributor, but you need to start being one. Clarinet Hawk (talk · contributions) 19:26, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Competency chart

You know, your competency tiers shouldn't have to be the same exact size as mine. I don't mind that you copied my competency chart to use as an template, but you should add some individuality to yours. Omega Tyrant 01:29, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

I'm Sorry

I apologize. I just wanted to show my opinion in tiers. User:Zeldasmash

You don't need to apologize, I was just suggesting that you should change the tiers' sizes. Not to cause trouble, but your test shows how good you are with each character, not how good of an character they are. Just in case you didn't know, my chart shows how good I am with each character and not my opinion on tiers. Omega Tyrant 01:44, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well All Right

Thanks. I guess i said the wrong thing. The thing is i don't know how to change the tier list size.

Well if you tell me how you want your tiers to be, I can make the changes for you tomorrow. Omega Tyrant 02:07, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Sweet

Well ok then. Thanks. Well i hope this isn't much of a bother. Look below

S Tier

• Link
• Meta Knight
• Captain Falcon
• Samus
• Fox
• Falco
• Wolf

A Tier

• Mario
• Snake
• Ike
• Lucario

B Tier

• Kirby
• Sonic
• R.O.B
• Mr.Game & Watch
• Marth

C Tier

• Sheik
• Zelda
• Pikachu
• Luigi

D Tier

• Pit
• Jigglypuff
• Pokemon Trainer
• Ice Climbers

E Tier

• King Dedede
• Ness
• Zero Suit Samus

F Tier

• Yoshi
• Bowser
• Peach
• Olimar
• Wario
• Toon Link
• Diddy Kong
• Lucas

G Tier

• Ganondorf

Can we talk?

Omega can we talk for a while? I want to talk with you for a minute. User: Zeldasmash

Do you mean on the IRC? Sure, I'm on right now but in the future when you ask someone something, you should ask them it on their on their talkpage. Omega Tyrant 20:52, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Brawl

I want to brawl you. Respond on IRC. Also, can you log in and edit?--Megatron1 (talk) 23:12, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

You're on User:Zeldasmash

Talk about it on IRC.--Megatron1 (talk) 00:59, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

This is taking to long

Omega, when are you making the changes, no offense but your taking too long. I'm sorry if i hurt your patience.

You see, I'm multitasking right now. My update is a major update, I'm talking on the IRC, making sure no one vandalizes any pages, and I'm eating. I can't assure you that I'll organize your tiers by midnight but I'll do it before I go to sleep. Omega Tyrant 01:25, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, i know I'm being impatient. User: Zeldasmash

Priority

The things you say on your userpage about Link's and Captain Falcon's priority is false. Go take a look at the Priority page. Omega Tyrant 02:59, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. But how am i supposed to know the priority. User:Zeldasmash

Very simply, you shouldn't mention it at all as it is not a characteristic of each character or attack, but a characteristic of every hitbox. Therefore, no character really has a priority advantage over another character and there are no characters with "low" priority or "high" priority. Omega Tyrant 03:19, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

So what you are saying is that every priority is the same User: Zeldasmash

On average no. Technically, Ganondorf's priority is higher than Sheik's overall due to him having attacks with much more damaging hitboxes. But there is not enough of a difference between any two characters for anyone to truly have a priority advantage. Again, it is not a characteristic of each character but a characteristic of every hitbox. Omega Tyrant 03:29, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Make sense, okay. Oh and remember the changes User: Zeldasmash June 8, 2010 (UTC)

User Page

The list above doesn't match either of your two charts on your userpage. Do you want me to base your tiers as the same ratio as in the list above? Omega Tyrant 04:24, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Sure User: Zeldasmash 04:26, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

OK then, you shouldn't make anymore edits to your page until I'm done. Omega Tyrant 04:29, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

All righty. Thanks for your help, Omega. User: Zeldasmash

Alright, this is going too far.

Your high amount of edits to your userpage is clogging up the Recent Changes; it's hard to tell what's actually being contributed to the wiki. So, here's how things are going to work now. You will learn to use the Preview button. Click it, and nothing will be saved, but you'll see what things are going to look like. This lets you make extremely large/complicated changes while clicking on the Save Page button only once.

As motivation for learning to preview pages, if I (or other admins, if they feel like it) catch you making too many minor edits to your userpage in a short amount of time, I will lock the page for 24 hours. Toomai Glittershine The Stats Guy 14:44, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and a note on the matchup templates you're using. The syntax has changed, see Template:Matchup for the new syntax. Toomai Glittershine The Stats Guy 20:39, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Tier list

Would you mind me moving your tier list to a user sub page?Mr. Anon (talk) 04:03, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Not at all User: Zeldasmash 04:04, June 9, 2010

Brawl

Ivy73 and I are brawling. You can join if you want.--Megatron1 (talk) 15:30, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Sure User: Zeldasmash

Go on IRC then.--Megatron1 (talk) 15:45, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Tier Lists

I made that tier list for you but there are some things that you are going to have to start doing. Firstly, I noticed you have not been signing your posts properly. To sign your posts, simply put ~~~~ at the end of your posts. I also highly recommend that you start making constructive edits to the mainspace. Unless you start doing these two things, I'll not help you post anymore of your tier lists on your userpage in the future. Omega Tyrant 08:16, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Got it. User: Zeldasmash Zeldasmash (talk) 11:16, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

This...

...is atrocious. Not even a fifth of your edits to this site are constructive, and that is frankly a joke. Stop focusing so much on your userspace and start actually benefiting the wiki. Shadowcrest 03:12, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

block

You have been blocked for 2 weeks for frankly just being annoying. You have contributed very little to the site, and much of what you have contributed to the mainspace has been reverted. Your talkpage/forum contributions are not very meaningful either, so you don't even have that argument in your defense. Honestly, your pattern of contributions sucks, and if it doesn't change then I'd have no problems permabanning you-- the only reason I didn't do that this time is because you have no blocks for it in the past and I felt that the jump to perma was too long. Now that you do have a block for being a poor contributor, I would not feel so forgiving next time. Some things I would recommend doing:

1. Stop focusing so much on your userspace. Nobody really cares about what tier you think each character should be or what your userpage looks like.
2. Look for ways to improve the mainspace, and don't give me some half-assed excuse that "there's nothing to edit QQ" because there is. Look for pages that are formatted improperly. Make sure pages are categorized correctly. Assuming your grammatical skills are up to snuff, re-write poorly written sections. There's a lot to do if you would just look for them. Special:Random and Special:Recentchanges are fine ways to do it, or you could go through sets of pages (such as all character pages or all stages) and make sure they look good. It's not that hard.
3. If you are like me and find editing the mainspace extremely boring, then participate in useful discussions in user talk/forum/smashwiki spaces. If you have something intelligent to contribute to a discussion, just add it in. People will notice. However, the key here is that your comments need to be intelligent and that the discussion needs to actually be relevant to the wiki- if you're just discussing what tier a character should be in, you're wasting my time and yours. Not cool.
   

I hope that, upon your return, you will actually take what I've said here into consideration, because normally in my post-block explanation comments I'm not so forgiving. So don't make me have wasted my time telling you this.

PS. There are a number of other users that this message applies to. If you are one of these users, you should also take note of my advice here, because I will probably not be as lenient next time. Shadowcrest 21:48, July 15, 2010 (UTC)