Talk:Tier list/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

m
relinking away from disambig
mNo edit summary
m (relinking away from disambig)
Line 77: Line 77:
:::"''it will never be accurate or even effective at deciding the utility and of each character''"
:::"''it will never be accurate or even effective at deciding the utility and of each character''"


:::Look up tournament results kid, the best players of higher tier characters perform consistently better than the best players of lower tier characters. Here's the articles for [[Apex 2012]], [[SKTAR]], [[SRT]], and [[Apex 2013]], the most prestigious Brawl nationals in the past year and a half. Tell me how many Ganondorfs and other low tier characters you see high up, compared to the amount of Meta Knights and other high tier characters. These tier lists are certainly accurate in their intended function of ranking how competitively viable each character is.
:::Look up tournament results kid, the best players of higher tier characters perform consistently better than the best players of lower tier characters. Here's the articles for [[Apex 2012]], {{b|SKTAR|tournament}}, [[SRT]], and [[Apex 2013]], the most prestigious Brawl nationals in the past year and a half. Tell me how many Ganondorfs and other low tier characters you see high up, compared to the amount of Meta Knights and other high tier characters. These tier lists are certainly accurate in their intended function of ranking how competitively viable each character is.


:::"''is stupid because it does not agree with you, you and every person who believes that the tier list is effective are deluded''"
:::"''is stupid because it does not agree with you, you and every person who believes that the tier list is effective are deluded''"