16,280
edits
User talk:Byllant: Difference between revisions
m
→Yo
(→Yo) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (→Yo) |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
::::You were direspectful because you swear, that's a proof you were mad, don't ever get mad, whoever gets mad first loses the argument... nah! I'm teasing you with that last one, but still, relax and avoid cursing. | ::::You were direspectful because you swear, that's a proof you were mad, don't ever get mad, whoever gets mad first loses the argument... nah! I'm teasing you with that last one, but still, relax and avoid cursing. | ||
::::'''--[[User:Byllant|Byllant]] ([[User talk:Byllant#top|talk]]) 01:27, 25 April 2014 (EDT)''' | ::::'''--[[User:Byllant|Byllant]] ([[User talk:Byllant#top|talk]]) 01:27, 25 April 2014 (EDT)''' | ||
:::::"''That's Wikia's "fault", I don't normally check the recent changes page as I'm very used to the Wikia's wiki activity page, the same way I'm now very used to Wikia's message walls than user talk pages. I expected your respones to be on my talk page at first, that's why I never checked back your talk page, I'm not a stalker.''" | |||
:::::So you never even bothered to read our talk page policy in the first place, nor even bothered to actually look at how other people work on the Wiki, even though you have been here for years now (nor even bothered to notice a post on your talkpage already got moved to the page the conversation was started on)? And making sure you got a response before doing something disputed is "stalking" rather than being responsible? No, it's not "Wikia's fault", it's your own fault for being an incompetent and irresponsible user. | |||
:::::"''Have you ever come around other wikis around the internet?''" | |||
:::::Have you ever actually been around actual people? '''''Everyone''''' calls it a variation of "Super Smash Bros. 4", unless they are trying to be "official", which the vast majority of people don't give a shit for. | |||
:::::And that's the point of SW:OFFICIAL, to use the most efficient and well-known term for familiarity and ease of information. If the official term is such, like pivot grab, good we'll gladly use it then. If the official term is some ultra gaudy term that's difficult to flow properly in articles, such as "Super Smash Bros. for Wii U and 3DS", or is some weird obscure name the majority of readers won't get, such a ukemi, thus no one uses them and it's a disservice to us and the readers to use them, then we're not going to use them when a better and more common term exists. If you want to irrationally completely value "being official" over everything else and all reasonable logic, then this wiki might not be for you. | |||
:::::"''I mentioned Waluigi's case as a proof that maybe some mistakes could have been commited in the direct (like a chance the Boxing Ring could also still be considered a Smash Bros. stage)''" | |||
:::::This is completely irrelevant, and if anything, this would be "proof" that they "mislabeled" an obvious boxing-inspired stage as a "Smash stage" (if they did labelled it as such) instead of being from the blatant boxing game. It hurts your point if anything. | |||
:::::"''You were direspectful because you swear''" | |||
:::::Hahaha, so you're 12 then, huh? <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 13:37, 25 April 2014 (EDT) | |||