16,283
edits
Talk:Top 100 Smash Bros. Players of All Time: Difference between revisions
Talk:Top 100 Smash Bros. Players of All Time (edit)
Revision as of 18:39, February 20, 2021
, 3 years ago→Notability
m (→Notability) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (→Notability) |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
::::: I have messaged Gardex. I'll report back with any response. [[User:Barnard's Loop|Barnard's Loop]] ([[User talk:Barnard's Loop|talk]]) 21:07, February 19, 2021 (EST) | ::::: I have messaged Gardex. I'll report back with any response. [[User:Barnard's Loop|Barnard's Loop]] ([[User talk:Barnard's Loop|talk]]) 21:07, February 19, 2021 (EST) | ||
:::::: Updates and sources are posted to the Retro SSBBRank talk page. Gardex, ADHD, Poyo, Luigisama, and seemingly everybody involved in Brawl sanctioned orange's project, considers the data to be good, contributed some to the project, and responded promptly to confirm. This should close the matter entirely. [[User:Barnard's Loop|Barnard's Loop]] ([[User talk:Barnard's Loop|talk]]) 16:29, February 20, 2021 (EST) | :::::: Updates and sources are posted to the Retro SSBBRank talk page. Gardex, ADHD, Poyo, Luigisama, and seemingly everybody involved in Brawl sanctioned orange's project, considers the data to be good, contributed some to the project, and responded promptly to confirm. This should close the matter entirely. [[User:Barnard's Loop|Barnard's Loop]] ([[User talk:Barnard's Loop|talk]]) 16:29, February 20, 2021 (EST) | ||
:::::::Thank you, that will suffice. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 17:39, February 20, 2021 (EST) | |||
I mostly agree with the arguments for deletion. Hpwever, if this individuals work is of the highest standard and fills significant information gaps then it may be of value. Also, I don't think we need to worry about opening the floodgates to these kind of articles provided we require these to be of the highest quality and to be filling significant information gaps. All that said to say, for it to be notable it should either be accepted by the broader smash community (this isnt) or be accepted by enough notable smash researchers/historians (I don't know about this one). So for now I remain leaning towards deletion, but I do think their is an argument for keeping it. [[User:Wiifitkid|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid|talk]]) 16:19, February 17, 2021 (EST) | I mostly agree with the arguments for deletion. Hpwever, if this individuals work is of the highest standard and fills significant information gaps then it may be of value. Also, I don't think we need to worry about opening the floodgates to these kind of articles provided we require these to be of the highest quality and to be filling significant information gaps. All that said to say, for it to be notable it should either be accepted by the broader smash community (this isnt) or be accepted by enough notable smash researchers/historians (I don't know about this one). So for now I remain leaning towards deletion, but I do think their is an argument for keeping it. [[User:Wiifitkid|Wiifitkid]] ([[User talk:Wiifitkid|talk]]) 16:19, February 17, 2021 (EST) | ||