Talk:Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 171: Line 171:


I do see your point, but there's no good way to phrase it to make the difference clear, and it's also already covered on {{uv|Yoshi}} and {{uv|F-Zero}} by the fact that they note they are the only universes to be in all four games with only one representative. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="magenta">cupid♥</font>]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  19:55, 13 February 2016 (EST)
I do see your point, but there's no good way to phrase it to make the difference clear, and it's also already covered on {{uv|Yoshi}} and {{uv|F-Zero}} by the fact that they note they are the only universes to be in all four games with only one representative. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="magenta">cupid♥</font>]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  19:55, 13 February 2016 (EST)
== Move to Super Smash Bros. (game)? ==
To a newcomer to the wiki who's trying to find this page and not the entire series, it might get confusing. I thought it might be helpful if we added (game) at the end of the title so it'd be a little bit more convenient. [[User:FinalSmashMan|FinalSmashMan]] ([[User talk:FinalSmashMan|talk]]) 00:05, March 15, 2019 (EDT)
:I second this. I'm 100% certain that the games official title is not Super Smash Bros 64. I'd rename it myself but it's a major article and I'm not sure that two people can make such a decision. [[User:KungFuLakitu|KungFuLakitu]] ([[User talk:KungFuLakitu|talk]]) 16:35, April 30, 2019 (EDT)
::#It's ''because'' it's the first game that it doesn't get the classification. The [[Super Smash Bros. (series)|series]] and [[Super Smash Bros. (universe)|universe]] pages get the classification because they cover the generalness of the series itself and what the universe encompasses, respectively - the first game is just that: the first game. It's the same reason why [[Miiverse]] doesn't have "(stage)" at the end of the page name, because it's simply what it is - it's a type of priority, a "bonus" of being something major within the series.
::#The page is not called "Super Smash Bros. 64", and even if it was, [[SW:OFFICIAL|SmashWiki is not official]].
::[[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''the Rurouni'''</span>]] 17:24, April 30, 2019 (EDT)
:::I completely agree with you, but "Super Smash Bros 64." is not an appropriate name for one of the biggest articles on the site, a featured article. The period after the 64 rather than Bros is especially unfitting, and "Super Smash Bros. (game)" would be a much more appropriate title on the wiki. An article that is on the site's toolbar shouldn't have such a mess of a name. [[User:KungFuLakitu|KungFuLakitu]] ([[User talk:KungFuLakitu|talk]]) 16:29, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
::::Are you referring to adding "(game)" to the page's URL, or the title on the page? Although its not the "official" name, most people ''do'' refer to it as ''Smash '''64''''' to differ from the series itself. The original ''Paper Mario'' is also commonly referred to as ''Paper Mario '''64''''' for the same reason. Despite a lot of games released on the N64 having '''64''' at the end, not all games without the 64 are referred to as '''64'''. ''Smash'' and ''Paper Mario'' just happen to some of them referred to as such. I believe it may stem from the fact that the next installment in the series was released on a different console. If finding the page is the problem, all the installments are always listed on the navigation on the left side of the Wiki under the Wiki's logo for that very reason. If we ''were'' to add "(game)", it would make more sense, to ''me'', to add it to the '''URL''' and not the page itself. However, the series is ''already'' specified to be a separate page by having "(series)". Although it is weird how the period is after ''64'' and not ''Bros'' considering its after Bros in the title. [[User:Wolff|&#32;Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 18:18, May 1, 2019 (EDT)
== SSB64 Electronics Edition ==
Starters: Sony, Philips, Nikon, Epson, Toshiba, Samsung, Hitachi, TDK
Unlockables: Sharp, Fujitsu, Kyocera, HP <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:GregHeffley12345|GregHeffley12345]] ([[User talk:GregHeffley12345|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/GregHeffley12345|contribs]]) 9:37, August 28, 2020 (EDT) </small>
:This is improper usage of the talk page. See [[SW:TALK]] for more details. [[User:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:#850FFA; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Señor'''</span> <span style="color:#850FFA;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px green">'''Mexicano'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:SenorMexicano|<span style="color:lightpurple;text-shadow:0px 0px 2px lightgreen">(talk)</span>]]'' 10:27, August 28, 2020 (EDT)
== Mewtwo was supposed to be playable? ==
According to bulbapedia, Mewtwo was supposed to be playable. [https://www.nintendo.co.jp/n01/n64/software/nus_p_nalj/smash/PostResult2.html This is their source], but I can't read Japanese, so I don't know what it says. Should we add it here? [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 19:03, December 24, 2021 (EST)
:Unused content is already covered on [[Unused content (SSB)|this page]], so I don't think Mewtwo being planned for ''Smsah 64'' really belongs here.
:As for the source you provided, the page is actually a poll where fans can vote for which character they want to see in a "potential sequel", and Mewtwo tied for 6th place with James Bond. For more information, I suggest you check [[User:The Jacketed Terrapin/Super Smash Bros. 64 Official Character Poll|this draft I made]]. [[File:JacketTerraSig1.png|20px]]'''The [[User:The Jacketed Terrapin|<span style="color: blue;">Jacketed</span>]] [[User talk:The Jacketed Terrapin|<span style="color: green;">Terrapin</span>]]'''[[File:JacketTerraSig2.png|20px]] 19:30, December 24, 2021 (EST)
==Removal of differences section==
This section feels redundant and unnecessary when basically the exact same information is conveyed better in the Melee article. It should just be removed.[[User:The Other Jared|The Other Jared]] ([[User talk:The Other Jared|talk]]) 16:59, January 18, 2024 (EST)
5,505

edits