Talk:Quark Mine: Difference between revisions

 
Line 20: Line 20:
:::::::::It's unofficial lingo/conjectural, like the "[[thorn helix]]." <font face="LuzSans-Book" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">ninjakoopa</span>]]</font> 21:46, 22 December 2012 (EST)
:::::::::It's unofficial lingo/conjectural, like the "[[thorn helix]]." <font face="LuzSans-Book" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">ninjakoopa</span>]]</font> 21:46, 22 December 2012 (EST)
::::::::::So...you claim unoffical lingo isn't allowed to be given proper noun status? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Obfuscating 21:49, 22 December 2012 (EST)
::::::::::So...you claim unoffical lingo isn't allowed to be given proper noun status? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Obfuscating 21:49, 22 December 2012 (EST)
:::::::::::Well, if we are to give proper noun status to Quark Mine, we'd have to do so to others which I wouldn't object, but we've already done so many moves where the second word in the title of an object is changed to begin with a lower-case letter in accordance to the general titling rule. I'd be more supportive of this status if the unofficial lingo objects like the Quark Mine and Thorn helix were usable items, but alas they are purely environmental. I think it's also a general rule that conjectural titles be kept unproper since no official source has named them. <font face="LuzSans-Book" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">ninjakoopa</span>]]</font> 23:08, 22 December 2012 (EST)
6,992

edits