Talk:Tier list/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

m
Line 208: Line 208:
:::#Your argument is utter bullshit. What you said amounts to saying, "the tier list is wrong because tournament rules suck." The tier list is only made in the scope of competitive play. Yes, Free for Alls, final smashes, and items don't mean a thing when it comes to determining a character's competitive worth.
:::#Your argument is utter bullshit. What you said amounts to saying, "the tier list is wrong because tournament rules suck." The tier list is only made in the scope of competitive play. Yes, Free for Alls, final smashes, and items don't mean a thing when it comes to determining a character's competitive worth.
:::#Why don't you fucking read [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|this]], and respond properly to [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|it]]. Well made arguments tailored specifically to [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|this]] are the only arguments that would be taken as "logical and irrefutable." Again, on behalf of OT, I will ask this. In the scope of competitive play (no items, final smashes, 1v1, 4 stock(melee)/3 stock(brawl) 8 mins, tournament legal stages only) how the hell can Melee Kirby be just as good Melee Jigglypuff or how can brawl Ganondorf be just as good as Snake? In fact you should really think about that first before responding to [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|this]].--<span style="background-color:#6d84e1;border:3px solid silver">[[User:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:silver">'''Brian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:black">Don't try me!</span>]]</sup>[[File:Falco.gif|link=|27px]]</span> 14:19, 28 June 2013 (EDT)
:::#Why don't you fucking read [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|this]], and respond properly to [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|it]]. Well made arguments tailored specifically to [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|this]] are the only arguments that would be taken as "logical and irrefutable." Again, on behalf of OT, I will ask this. In the scope of competitive play (no items, final smashes, 1v1, 4 stock(melee)/3 stock(brawl) 8 mins, tournament legal stages only) how the hell can Melee Kirby be just as good Melee Jigglypuff or how can brawl Ganondorf be just as good as Snake? In fact you should really think about that first before responding to [[User:Semicolon/Treatise on the Existence of Tiers|this]].--<span style="background-color:#6d84e1;border:3px solid silver">[[User:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:silver">'''Brian'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:1337 B33FC4K3|<span style="color:black">Don't try me!</span>]]</sup>[[File:Falco.gif|link=|27px]]</span> 14:19, 28 June 2013 (EDT)
"''My third point is the most effective anti-tier slogan yet. "All the good players look at the tier list, choose high-tiered characters, and get new strategies for them, reinforcing their position on the tier list." I know this is'nt anti-tier, but It makes sence considering the above two points. (I think this has been answered, but I forget where.)''"
Dude, blindly repeating arguments that were refuted in the treatise is something '''I explicitly state not to do, and it is a banworthy offense'''. Now drop it.
"''My fourth point is about clones. Clones are slightly different than their origionals, '''and usually worse'''''"
The instant you say any character to be worse, is the instant you admit characters are not equal, and thus tiers exist.
2/10, your argument is just as shit as other anti-tiers. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 14:48, 28 June 2013 (EDT)