5,586
edits
Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions
→Splitting all shared special moves
John3637881 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
I am kind of going back on myself by saying that all fighters' special moves need pages, but like I've stated, that is the most consistent option. Depending on the ideas of others, I am willing to find a compromise if there is one to be had, but I think we can all agree at least that there needs to be a consistent ruling on how to go about these pages. <b>[[User:john3637881|<span style="color: black;">John</span>]]</b> [[File:John3637881 Signature.png|20px]] <b>[[User talk:John3637881|<span style="color: red;">HUAH!</span>]]</b> 23:29, May 27, 2019 (EDT) | I am kind of going back on myself by saying that all fighters' special moves need pages, but like I've stated, that is the most consistent option. Depending on the ideas of others, I am willing to find a compromise if there is one to be had, but I think we can all agree at least that there needs to be a consistent ruling on how to go about these pages. <b>[[User:john3637881|<span style="color: black;">John</span>]]</b> [[File:John3637881 Signature.png|20px]] <b>[[User talk:John3637881|<span style="color: red;">HUAH!</span>]]</b> 23:29, May 27, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:If I'm not mistaken, there has yet to be [[Neutral_attack|individual]] [[Neutral_aerial|pages]] for attacks that aren't specials or Final Smashes. Is there a reason only specials have pages? | |||
:I know that there is not anything necessarily preventing us from adding as meany pages as possible, but I feel having 15 or more pages needs approval from a few admins (''especially'' is its closer to 80). At least so that they don't have to delete so meany pages if they were to deem it unnecessary (like with the one who was replacing images before|That was around 200). | |||
:Also, I'm confused. Is it really a problem to use the table of contents to skip to the desired section? Isn't that what the ToC if for, to jump to the desired section? Plus, a lot of pages have, and would have, more info than the Blaster combined so I don't think bytes size is ''that'' predominate a problem outside of talk pages. I think if it was, trying to minimize the amount of info on all pages would be more common. Some like character pages only get larger due to the amount of info. (Origin/Smash Installments/Pictures/Trivia/So on) I'm just confused with the reasoning with the byte size. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 12:46, May 28, 2019 (EDT) | |||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal}} | ||