User talk:ChuckNorris24/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Now hang on a moment
(Now hang on a moment)
Line 38: Line 38:
::No dude, you can't just say "Toomai didn't respond" Finish the discussion before changing it back. <span style="font-family:Triforce, sans-serif;">'''[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color=#008000>D<font color=#008019>o<font color=#008031>c<font color=#008049>t<font color=#008062>o<font color=#008080>rP</font>a</font>i</font>n</font>9</font>9</font>]]'''</span> 15:58, 16 August 2013 (EDT)
::No dude, you can't just say "Toomai didn't respond" Finish the discussion before changing it back. <span style="font-family:Triforce, sans-serif;">'''[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color=#008000>D<font color=#008019>o<font color=#008031>c<font color=#008049>t<font color=#008062>o<font color=#008080>rP</font>a</font>i</font>n</font>9</font>9</font>]]'''</span> 15:58, 16 August 2013 (EDT)
:How does the AT template look "tacky", and how does converting to a less specific template with more irrelevant boxes help? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Cloronic 16:59, 16 August 2013 (EDT)
:How does the AT template look "tacky", and how does converting to a less specific template with more irrelevant boxes help? [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Cloronic 16:59, 16 August 2013 (EDT)
::The ICG template is more complete and it is much more specific than the AT template. The AT template has barely any information and it just looks unprofessional. And if the boxes are "irrelevant", why do playable characters get them? I think they are nice little bits of information. <span style="font-family:AR JULIAN; font-size:12pt">[[User:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Chuck</span>]][[User talk:ChuckNorris24|<span style="color:brown">Norris</span>]]</span>[[File:24.png|23px]]  09:55, 17 August 2013 (EDT)