Talk:Mewtwo: Difference between revisions

Talk:Mewtwo (edit)

Revision as of 01:15, September 17, 2014

485 bytes added , 9 years ago

→‎Mewtwo may still be in SSB4

Qwerty

3,210

edits

Revision as of 00:01, September 17, 2014 (edit) Toomai (talk \| contribs) (→‎Mewtwo may still be in SSB4) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:15, September 17, 2014 (edit) (undo) Qwerty (talk \| contribs) (→‎Mewtwo may still be in SSB4) Newer edit →
Line 95:		Line 95:

	You're talking about the rumour where the leaker posted an image and then stated five characters (including Mewtwo) were for DLC as the image's caption, right? If so, that text has been confirmed false, as an intentional attempt by the leaker to identify copycats. [[User:Toomai\|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai\|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png\|20px\|link=User:Toomai/Bin\|???]] The Wacko 00:01, 17 September 2014 (EDT)		You're talking about the rumour where the leaker posted an image and then stated five characters (including Mewtwo) were for DLC as the image's caption, right? If so, that text has been confirmed false, as an intentional attempt by the leaker to identify copycats. [[User:Toomai\|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai\|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png\|20px\|link=User:Toomai/Bin\|???]] The Wacko 00:01, 17 September 2014 (EDT)

			I'm just going to note: The IP is not the only one who broke 1RV. The rule clearly states that an edit should not be reverted if it is in violation of this policy. This happened twice (and once by the IP). <font face="sand">''[[User:Qwerty\|<font color="black">Qw</font><font color="003F3F">er</font><font color="005F5F">ty</font>]] ''[[User talk:Qwerty\|<font color="005F6F">(t</font><font color="003C6F">al</font><font color="000F7F">k)</font>]]</font> 01:15, 17 September 2014 (EDT)