24,977
edits
Talk:List of meteor smashes (SSBM): Difference between revisions
→Does this article need images of every meteor smash?
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::It doesn't get a good view of the character using it, especially if the opponent gets sent far away. What's the big deal of showing the trajectories of meteor smashes anyways when all of the other attacks don't have them? A gif of the attack being used by itself would be vastly superior due to the close-up. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:02, 10 October 2013 (EDT) | ::It doesn't get a good view of the character using it, especially if the opponent gets sent far away. What's the big deal of showing the trajectories of meteor smashes anyways when all of the other attacks don't have them? A gif of the attack being used by itself would be vastly superior due to the close-up. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 19:02, 10 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
:::What, a ''/closeup of it being used/'' isn't a good view? It doesn't need to be zoomed out to demonstrate the meteor smash, as both the attack and the opponent can clearly be seen. And what the hell would we gain from deleting all those images outside of a recent changes flood as unnecessary as [[Special:Contributions/Monsterdude101|this]]? [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 15:24, 11 October 2013 (EDT) | :::What, a ''/closeup of it being used/'' isn't a good view? It doesn't need to be zoomed out to demonstrate the meteor smash, as both the attack and the opponent can clearly be seen. And what the hell would we gain from deleting all those images outside of a recent changes flood as unnecessary as [[Special:Contributions/Monsterdude101|this]]? [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 15:24, 11 October 2013 (EDT) | ||
::::Not all of them are closeups, look at [[List of meteor smashes (SSB)|the Smash 64]] images. I also never said that the images had to be zoomed out. Also look at images like [[:File:Ike Down Tilt Meteor Smash Brawl.png|this one]] where a still image doesn't help to capture the attack clearly. What would best would be a gif using the attack on an opponent without zooming too far away, or the user by itself with the meteor smash hitbox being displayed. These still images by themselves would not be acceptable, and the gifs should be created for every attack. [[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Awesome'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''Cardinal'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">'''2000'''</span>]] 15:56, 11 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
:::::Gifs would be fine, but it would still cause an arguably unnecessary recent changes flood. [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 16:00, 11 October 2013 (EDT) | |||
To answer the question in the section title: No, it does not and should not. It is totally pointless to have more than an example and perhaps a few notables from each game. That's what we have categories for. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Trumpeteer 16:59, 11 October 2013 (EDT) | |||