Smasher talk:Grim Tuesday: Difference between revisions

:::But does your smasher page say this? Your smasher page in its current state is that of a non notable smasher. As said before, anyone can say they've been to tournaments and such. I'm not calling you a lair, but it would be great if you could provide poof of your notability through links without me having to research you. As for high level content, that is a subjective criteria and I didn't create this policy, you'll have to ask someone else why forums don't count. As for your final statement, I'm fully aware that there are smasher articles of non notable smashers. But before you delete any smasher article, you have to research them (or ask someone else to) to see if they are notable and whoever created the article was just being lazy. Only those that are obviously not notable should be deleted without any research. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png|25px ]] 11:33, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

:::::I believe forums are exluded from notability because anyone can join a small/lesser-known Smash Bros. forum and become a top contributor without being known to the Smash Bros. community outside of that forum (SmashBoards might be an exception). "High-level content" I believe would include things like frame data, technique discovery, physics research, metagame development/documentation, and such. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] 11:52, August 8, 2010 (UTC)