5,586
edits
Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions
→Splitting all shared special moves
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
::It may just be me, but because "function" is used, "animation" here just sounds like a visual aesthetic change. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 23:53, June 24, 2019 (EDT) | ::It may just be me, but because "function" is used, "animation" here just sounds like a visual aesthetic change. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 23:53, June 24, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::Well, I'm specifically talking about the animation of the model and not any accompanying particle effects. I'm thinking it over in my head, and most moves people would want to merge use the same core animation. The only exceptions I can think of are Dark Samus' Missiles (which is a minor change that most people wouldn't notice, and it still fulfills the other two criteria anyway), and Isabelle's version of Balloon Trip (where it's kind of common sense to differ in the "animation" regard). [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:37, June 25, 2019 (EDT) | :::Well, I'm specifically talking about the animation of the model and not any accompanying particle effects. I'm thinking it over in my head, and most moves people would want to merge use the same core animation. The only exceptions I can think of are Dark Samus' Missiles (which is a minor change that most people wouldn't notice, and it still fulfills the other two criteria anyway), and Isabelle's version of Balloon Trip (where it's kind of common sense to differ in the "animation" regard). [[User:Ahemtoday|Ahemtoday]] ([[User talk:Ahemtoday|talk]]) 18:37, June 25, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::Wouldn't that still fall under "Function"? [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 18:42, June 25, 2019 (EDT) | |||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal}} | ||