2,433
edits
For Fun: Difference between revisions
→Reception: akin to what I did with the taunt match page; there were players who did legitimately enjoy them.
m (Text replacement - "{{ArticleIcons\|([^}]+)}}" to "{{ArticleIcons|$1|online=y}}") |
(→Reception: akin to what I did with the taunt match page; there were players who did legitimately enjoy them.) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Reception== | ==Reception== | ||
Because For Fun was deliberately designed for unbalanced "fun" play, it incurs far less scrutiny from players in contrast to [[For Glory]]. While much better-received than [[Basic Brawl]], it has been met with some criticism, most notably the inability to usually play with fewer than four players (resulting in frequent online lag), as well as commonly hosting [[taunt match]]es despite the presence of a hard-coded taunt limit. | Because For Fun was deliberately designed for unbalanced "fun" play, it incurs far less scrutiny from players in contrast to [[For Glory]]. While much better-received than [[Basic Brawl]], it has been met with some criticism, most notably the inability to usually play with fewer than four players (resulting in frequent online lag), as well as commonly hosting [[taunt match]]es despite the presence of a hard-coded [[taunt]] limit. On the other hand, casual players that enjoyed taunt matches believed that the attempts to restrict taunt matches were too heavy-handed, believing that the name "For Fun" implies that taunts and the like shouldn't be restricted. This would later be addressed with the addition of [[Battle Arena]]s in ''Ultimate'', allowing taunt matches to be played with impunity. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||