Talk:Dash attack canceled up smash: Difference between revisions

Talk:Dash attack canceled up smash (edit)

Revision as of 03:32, May 29, 2009

752 bytes added , 15 years ago

Article Title

PenguinofDeath

2,584

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== Article Title ==
+I hate to say this, but... "canceled" and "canceling" are non-standard alternative spellings of "cancelled" and "cancelling", and are used nowhere but the States. Even in the US the correct spellings are "cancelled" and "cancelling" - this isn't just because I speak English (UK) rather than English (US), the name of this article is spelt incorrectly, wherever you are. It just makes the page seem less encyclopaedic if there's a spelling mistake in the title. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 07:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 == MERGE!!! ==
-how many names will we have for this technique: canceled dash attack into a sliding up samsh. plz someone put them all together. and prevent new ones from being made!--[[User:Tarrant1400|tarrant1400]] ([[User talk:Tarrant1400|talk]]) 07:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
+how many names will we have for this technique: canceled dash attack into a sliding up smash. plz someone put them all together. and prevent new ones from being made!--[[User:Tarrant1400|tarrant1400]] ([[User talk:Tarrant1400|talk]]) 07:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 DACUS is the official name, so this one stays I guess. [[User:Shade487z|<font color="red">Shade</font><font color="black">487</font><font color="yellow">z</font>]]/[[User talk:Shade487z|<font color="silver">Senior</font><font color="blue">Sombra!</font>]] 07:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
-NOOO!!! thats the prob!!! no- one is settling on the name. merge it first. then we can see which one the community decides. also, boost-smashing came first thats the name which should be official, DACUS can be A technical one, sure, but how can a brand-new article(DACUS) be "official?" --[[User:Tarrant1400|tarrant1400]] ([[User talk:Tarrant1400|talk]]) 08:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
+NOOO!!! that's the prob!!! no- one is settling on the name. merge it first. then we can see which one the community decides. also, boost-smashing came first that's the name which should be official, DACUS can be A technical one, sure, but how can a brand-new article(DACUS) be "official?" --[[User:Tarrant1400|tarrant1400]] ([[User talk:Tarrant1400|talk]]) 08:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 [[Smashboards]] calls it DACUS, so I assume it is the most common name used for this technique.[[User:Y462|Y462]] <small>([[User talk:Y462|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Y462|C]]  • [[Special:Editcount/Y462|E]] )</small> 19:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)