8,917
edits
Forum:Smash Remix content: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:'''Support 2''': Just leave it the way we currently do it for now. The reason we treat Project M and + the way we do is because it completely overshadowed the Brawl competitive scene and became too big to ignore. To my knowledge, while this mod has had tournament relevence and recently had a tour, it is still rather new so we should give it some time to make sure that it continues to grow and is not just a fad. Plus as you said the scene is much smaller than Project+, and even though it has likely grown since then (since that was over a year ago), it likely hasn't made the Smash 64 scene entirely obsolete as PM did to Brawl. While I agree it isn't fair to completely ignore it, and I wouldn't oppose giving it a page, I don't believe it should be treated with equal standards as PM/+ at least until it reaches that level of notability. [[File:725.png|20px]] '''[[User:Omega Toad|<font color="red">Omega Toad</font>]] [[User talk:Omega Toad|<font color="green">the Jolly Shiny Litten.</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Omega Toad|<font color="lightskyblue">(Seasons greetings!)</font>]]''' 06:32, January 11, 2022 (EST) | :'''Support 2''': Just leave it the way we currently do it for now. The reason we treat Project M and + the way we do is because it completely overshadowed the Brawl competitive scene and became too big to ignore. To my knowledge, while this mod has had tournament relevence and recently had a tour, it is still rather new so we should give it some time to make sure that it continues to grow and is not just a fad. Plus as you said the scene is much smaller than Project+, and even though it has likely grown since then (since that was over a year ago), it likely hasn't made the Smash 64 scene entirely obsolete as PM did to Brawl. While I agree it isn't fair to completely ignore it, and I wouldn't oppose giving it a page, I don't believe it should be treated with equal standards as PM/+ at least until it reaches that level of notability. [[File:725.png|20px]] '''[[User:Omega Toad|<font color="red">Omega Toad</font>]] [[User talk:Omega Toad|<font color="green">the Jolly Shiny Litten.</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Omega Toad|<font color="lightskyblue">(Seasons greetings!)</font>]]''' 06:32, January 11, 2022 (EST) | ||
:'''Support 3''': This mod has seen a lot of usage so I think it should be covered with icons and character pages. --[[User:Meester Tweester|Meester Tweester]] ([[User talk:Meester Tweester|talk]]) 14:03, January 31, 2022 (EST) | :'''Support 3''': This mod has seen a lot of usage so I think it should be covered with icons and character pages. --[[User:Meester Tweester|Meester Tweester]] ([[User talk:Meester Tweester|talk]]) 14:03, January 31, 2022 (EST) | ||
:I don't have strong feelings on having a Smash Remix article, but I will say that I '''strongly oppose''' having individual character articles and the like for the mod, like we do with PM. To be honest, I don't really support having character articles for PM either, but at least PM has had a very heavy impact on competitive smash, that I'm not convinced this mod has had. As for results, if a tournament we are covering anyway had a tournament for Remix, I guess it makes sense to include results for it, but I don't think Smash Remix content at an otherwise unnotable tournament should be used as grounds for covering that tournament. Essentially, when deciding whether or not to cover it, ignore SR content when making the decision, but if it is decided to cover the tournament, include coverage of SR on the article. I don't know what number this makes me. ''[[User:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: blue;">'''Alex'''</span>]] the [[User talk:Alex the weeb|<span style="color: red;">'''Weeb'''</span>]]'' 14:05, January 31, 2022 (EST) | |||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||