5,586
edits
Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions
→Splitting all shared special moves
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
:Also, I'm confused. Is it really a problem to use the table of contents to skip to the desired section? Isn't that what the ToC if for, to jump to the desired section? Plus, a lot of pages have, and would have, more info than the Blaster combined so I don't think bytes size is ''that'' predominate a problem outside of talk pages. I think if it was, trying to minimize the amount of info on all pages would be more common. Some like character pages only get larger due to the amount of info. (Origin/Smash Installments/Pictures/Trivia/So on) I'm just confused with the reasoning with the byte size. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 12:46, May 28, 2019 (EDT) | :Also, I'm confused. Is it really a problem to use the table of contents to skip to the desired section? Isn't that what the ToC if for, to jump to the desired section? Plus, a lot of pages have, and would have, more info than the Blaster combined so I don't think bytes size is ''that'' predominate a problem outside of talk pages. I think if it was, trying to minimize the amount of info on all pages would be more common. Some like character pages only get larger due to the amount of info. (Origin/Smash Installments/Pictures/Trivia/So on) I'm just confused with the reasoning with the byte size. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 12:46, May 28, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::The issue we were discussing seemed based on whether these moves should logically share a page depending on their name or their function. I don’t believe byte size matters here at all. Anyways, the only way to just completely stop all debate on which pages should be split or merged is to split all of them. I’m with John here. This has gone on long enough, and every time somebody isn’t satisfied because of an inconsistency with another page. Splitting all of them is the safest thing to do. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 20:35, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | ::The issue we were discussing seemed based on whether these moves should logically share a page depending on their name or their function. I don’t believe byte size matters here at all. Anyways, the only way to just completely stop all debate on which pages should be split or merged is to split all of them. I’m with John here. This has gone on long enough, and every time somebody isn’t satisfied because of an inconsistency with another page. Splitting all of them is the safest thing to do. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 20:35, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::I still think merging them by name is the better option. However, I have asked an admin if creating that amount of new pages would be acceptable or unnecessary. I guess we'll wait and see if the admin will respond. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 20:44, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | |||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal}} | ||