5,586
edits
Forum:Categorizing Special Moves: Difference between revisions
→Splitting all shared special moves
Tag: Mobile edit |
|||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
::::If we decide the question in terms of practicality, I think can compare pages rate of repetition and set a value to decide whether to split, just like the way we distinguish clones.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 02:43, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ::::If we decide the question in terms of practicality, I think can compare pages rate of repetition and set a value to decide whether to split, just like the way we distinguish clones.--[[User:Capstalker|Capstalker]] ([[User talk:Capstalker|talk]]) 02:43, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | :::::I don’t trust ourselves to come up with something practical. Our best bet is to just split them all. That way we can stop these drawn-out arguments on which ones to split and which ones to merge, because they’re all split. [[User:Lou Cena|Lou Cena]] ([[User talk:Lou Cena|talk]]) 02:50, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::But we need a better basis to split them all than just stopping "''these drawn-out arguments''", that is is only a part of basis and why we are having this entire topic to categorize the special moves in the first place. [[User:Wolff| Wolff]] ([[User talk:Wolff|talk]]) 03:03, May 16, 2019 (EDT) | |||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal}} | ||