Talk:Magic (type): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:I don't think we know for sure yet whether spirits work on the type or the effect (I've heard conflicting evidence). If it turns out they work on the effect (contrary to Brawl stickers), then apparently "magic" is indeed the official name for both the type and the effect, and it would be prudent to use it. So we'll have to keep things named as-is for now.
:I don't think we know for sure yet whether spirits work on the type or the effect (I've heard conflicting evidence). If it turns out they work on the effect (contrary to Brawl stickers), then apparently "magic" is indeed the official name for both the type and the effect, and it would be prudent to use it. So we'll have to keep things named as-is for now.
:'''I do support the split idea''' into "Magic (type)" and "Magic (effect)". We'd then probably do similar for [[Water]]. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Dispenser 09:41, April 14, 2019 (EDT)
:'''I do support the split idea''' into "Magic (type)" and "Magic (effect)". We'd then probably do similar for [[Water]]. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Dispenser 09:41, April 14, 2019 (EDT)
::Based on [[Special:Diff/1171499|this edit]] by Blue Sun (and various other entries already on the page), as well as the fact that in-game it mentions that it boosts Robin's spells (none of which use the magic effect), we know that they boost the type and not the effect, which is why this split is important.
::I also support splitting water, for the same reasons (although in that case we don't really have a choice when it comes to the naming). --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:18, April 14, 2019 (EDT)
1,358

edits