User talk:Smiddle/1: Difference between revisions

m
No edit summary
Line 78: Line 78:
::Well, okay, but I do recommend 5-headlines. 4 is pretty huge text for such a small categorical division. And 5 looks virtually the same as bold text, so I don't really understand what makes it not "good" by comparison to the headline formatting. Don't get me wrong, do whatever you like, it just seems like a bit of a waste of effort that could be spent better elsewhere. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 15:50, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
::Well, okay, but I do recommend 5-headlines. 4 is pretty huge text for such a small categorical division. And 5 looks virtually the same as bold text, so I don't really understand what makes it not "good" by comparison to the headline formatting. Don't get me wrong, do whatever you like, it just seems like a bit of a waste of effort that could be spent better elsewhere. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 15:50, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
: I meant 3-headlines. I said the wrong thing. Also, headlines produce an editable link to the right, bold text doesn't. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 16:25, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
: I meant 3-headlines. I said the wrong thing. Also, headlines produce an editable link to the right, bold text doesn't. {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 16:25, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
::3's even larger. No article on Smashboards should have enough SWF-specific external links to warrant needing to edit it as a specific section. -- [[User:Randall00|Randall00]] 19:41, February 23, 2007 (GMT)
20

edits