71,255
edits
User talk:Cookies and Creme: Difference between revisions
m
→Adding a Tournament summary section to all new tournament articles
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
As such, would you be down to help me by creating a "Tournament summary" section for every new tournament (at least for majors)? I see that you've created a lot of the new tournament articles so I figured I'd ask you about it first. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 13:54, June 3, 2023 (EDT) | As such, would you be down to help me by creating a "Tournament summary" section for every new tournament (at least for majors)? I see that you've created a lot of the new tournament articles so I figured I'd ask you about it first. '''[[User:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Ac2k|<span style="color: red;">Cardinal 2000</span>]]''' 13:54, June 3, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:I'm fine with it. In the past I [https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Tournament%3ARise_%27N_Grind&type=revision&diff=1720854&oldid=1720853 had gripes with trivia in tournament pages that feel like they should belong in their own section], so I've been trying to write sections similar to tournament summary sections that you've mentioned, or at least have a summary of the tournament in the introduction (eg, {{Trn|Maesuma TOP 12}} and {{Trn|Kagaribi 10}}). I do think it's a case-by-case situation though, since there are majors which seem to be relatively "normal"/don't have much to cover that couldn't be covered elsewhere, and for the most part anything below the level of major is also rather uneventful, but nevertheless I think a tournament summary section is certainly warranted especially for supermajors like Battle of BC. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 14:06, June 3, 2023 (EDT) | |||