User talk:25timmy16: Difference between revisions

m
Line 117: Line 117:


::::::::And I don't care who he says should return or not, but it's not an opinion that Wolf is not a clone, it's a fact, and I have the right to correct him on it. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 12:42, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
::::::::And I don't care who he says should return or not, but it's not an opinion that Wolf is not a clone, it's a fact, and I have the right to correct him on it. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 12:42, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::''Quite ironic coming from you going on about "user's opinion", when you censored me about what I had to say about a prospective RfA of yours, on the reasoning of "I'm wrong".'' First of all, some of those statements were flat out wrong. Not even arguable, just plain wrong, and it portrayed me as someone that I wasn't. You did the same thing to my user page about a year ago, so don't play that card. This is a different situation,  because it is showing an opinion about a fictional character and company, not another individual. <br /> ''And I don't care who he says should return or not, but it's not an opinion that Wolf is not a clone, it's a fact, and I have the right to correct him on it.'' It isn't a fact. It is a well-recognized opinion by the Brawl community. You could still have logical reasons to back up why Wolf is a clone (not that I think he is, but that isn't the point), and Nintendo and HAL don't say one way or the other. I am not trying to challenge your right to correct him, however, you and Anon turned this into an outright debate, which wasn't necessary. The user who's talk page this is hasn't even responded once. User talk pages, especially of users not even involved in the discussion, are not for debating aspects of SSB. It's pointless to debate about whether something on a user page is accurate. You gave him the correction, I called it an opinion (I maybe shouldn't have posted that either) and it should have ended there. He can have false info on his user page if he wants to. Don't make a big deal about it. Discussion closed. <font face="Triforce">[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color="purple">Dokteur</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dr. Pain 99|<font color="purple">Pain99</font>]]</font>  17:39, 21 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::''Quite ironic coming from you going on about "user's opinion", when you censored me about what I had to say about a prospective RfA of yours, on the reasoning of "I'm wrong".'' First of all, some of those statements were flat out wrong. Not even arguable, just plain wrong, and it portrayed me as someone that I wasn't. You erased your name off my user page about a year ago, so don't play that card. This is a different situation,  because it is showing an opinion about a fictional character and a company, not another individual. <br /> ''And I don't care who he says should return or not, but it's not an opinion that Wolf is not a clone, it's a fact, and I have the right to correct him on it.'' It isn't a fact. It is a well-recognized opinion by the Brawl community. You could still have logical reasons to back up why Wolf is a clone (not that I think he is, but that isn't the point), and Nintendo and HAL don't say one way or the other. I am not trying to challenge your right to correct him. However, you and Anon turned this into an outright debate, which wasn't necessary. The user who's talk page this is hasn't even responded once. User talk pages, especially of users not even involved in the discussion, are not for debating aspects of SSB. It's pointless to debate about whether something on a user page is accurate. You gave him the correction, I called it an opinion (I maybe shouldn't have posted that either) and it should have ended there. He can have false information on his user page if he wants to. Don't make a big deal about it. Discussion closed. <font face="Triforce">[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color="purple">Dokteur</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dr. Pain 99|<font color="purple">Pain99</font>]]</font>  17:39, 21 September 2011 (EDT)