56,648
edits
Talk:Tier list/Archive 4: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "w:c:wow:User:Sky2042" to "User:Sky2042"
m (Text replacement - "w:c:wow:User:Sky2042" to "User:Sky2042") |
|||
| (94 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | {{archive}}{{Archive box|7}} | ||
==Falcon's Wrong Numerical Value== | ==Falcon's Wrong Numerical Value== | ||
I'm actually surprised many people haven't noticed yet, but the list here is actually incorrect with the SBR Official Final Melee Tier List. Captain Falcon is tied with a numerical value of 8.00 with Jigglypuff. http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=199342 - x After Dawn x | I'm actually surprised many people haven't noticed yet, but the list here is actually incorrect with the SBR Official Final Melee Tier List. Captain Falcon is tied with a numerical value of 8.00 with Jigglypuff. http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=199342 - x After Dawn x<small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:173.183.210.117|173.183.210.117]] ([[User talk:173.183.210.117|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/173.183.210.117|contribs]]) </small> | ||
==Double Tier== | ==Double Tier== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 18: | ||
::::Well, what those people are doing is making a huge misunderstanding. They think that by making tiers that people are threatening some kind of "free choice" when it comes to characters. The truth is, it's the player with the controller, not the character. Once somebody learns a new trick with say, Mewtwo, Mewtwo may be number one some day. I'm not a big supporter of tiers myself, but I understnad that they do exist. [[User:¿Roderigo?|¿Roderigo?]] ([[User talk:¿Roderigo?|talk]]) 18:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | ::::Well, what those people are doing is making a huge misunderstanding. They think that by making tiers that people are threatening some kind of "free choice" when it comes to characters. The truth is, it's the player with the controller, not the character. Once somebody learns a new trick with say, Mewtwo, Mewtwo may be number one some day. I'm not a big supporter of tiers myself, but I understnad that they do exist. [[User:¿Roderigo?|¿Roderigo?]] ([[User talk:¿Roderigo?|talk]]) 18:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::^ person is smart. I like him already. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[ | :::::^ person is smart. I like him already. --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[User:Sky2042|w]]) 19:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Split? == | == Split? == | ||
| Line 118: | Line 109: | ||
LOL!! [[User:Majorabrawl|Majorabrawl]] ([[User talk:Majorabrawl|talk]]) 02:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | LOL!! [[User:Majorabrawl|Majorabrawl]] ([[User talk:Majorabrawl|talk]]) 02:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:That's not the Japanese tier list, it's just your revision. Next time, take it to the forums plz. <span style="border:2px outset #9900cc;background-color:white;-moz-border-radius:10px">'''[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#ff0099;">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#ff0099">Ninjakoopa</span>]]'''</span> 17:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | :That's not the Japanese tier list, it's just your revision. Next time, take it to the forums plz. <span style="border:2px outset #9900cc;background-color:white;-moz-border-radius:10px">'''[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#ff0099;">Blue</span>]] [[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#ff0099">Ninjakoopa</span>]]'''</span> 17:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
I think Japan's smart enough to put Jigglypuff somewhere.'''[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:#5F9EA0">Smoreking</span>]]<small><sup>[[User Talk:Smorekingxg456#Top|<span style="color:#00FF00">(T)</span>]]</sup></small><small><sub> [[Special:Contributions/Smorekingxg456|(c)]]</sub></small>''' 16:55, December 12, 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Forums? == | == Forums? == | ||
| Line 151: | Line 144: | ||
I also heard a rumor that there's a secret character in the game, but he's bottom tier. Of course, you never really can trust Jamaicans. [[User:13375poolR|13375poolR]] ([[User talk:13375poolR|talk]]) 05:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | I also heard a rumor that there's a secret character in the game, but he's bottom tier. Of course, you never really can trust Jamaicans. [[User:13375poolR|13375poolR]] ([[User talk:13375poolR|talk]]) 05:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:WTF is that supposed to mean, "You can never really trust Jamaicans?" Racist turd. | :WTF is that supposed to mean, "You can never really trust Jamaicans?" Racist turd. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:86.159.145.18|86.159.145.18]] ([[User talk:86.159.145.18|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/86.159.145.18|contribs]]) 09:56, 8 July 2009</small> | ||
::It was probably just a joke - a joke in extremely poor taste, and the sort of joke that's not really appropriate here, but a joke nonetheless. I would like to add that, no matter how righteous your anger was, your response to it was also inappropriate. In other news, that's one made up tier list... There's no way Ganondorf would be that high. He's got so many massive weaknesses that no one in their right mind would put him anywhere other than last. Sonic has no strong, reliable finishing moves. Mario's down tilt and his down special are both rubbish. Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon being that high is just laughable. King Dedede's clearly very good, no one would honestly put him that low. Sheik's strong and fast and has very good smashes, the same goes for ZSS, and Luigi got buffed from Melee so now he's better than Mario by a long way. This supposed tier list is the result of pure fabrication, nothing more. Also, the idea that there are still secret characters in Brawl that no one's discovered yet is simply ridiculous. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 10:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC) | ::It was probably just a joke - a joke in extremely poor taste, and the sort of joke that's not really appropriate here, but a joke nonetheless. I would like to add that, no matter how righteous your anger was, your response to it was also inappropriate. In other news, that's one made up tier list... There's no way Ganondorf would be that high. He's got so many massive weaknesses that no one in their right mind would put him anywhere other than last. Sonic has no strong, reliable finishing moves. Mario's down tilt and his down special are both rubbish. Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon being that high is just laughable. King Dedede's clearly very good, no one would honestly put him that low. Sheik's strong and fast and has very good smashes, the same goes for ZSS, and Luigi got buffed from Melee so now he's better than Mario by a long way. This supposed tier list is the result of pure fabrication, nothing more. Also, the idea that there are still secret characters in Brawl that no one's discovered yet is simply ridiculous. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 10:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
I like Ganondorf and am happy to know that some others agree with me when I say he isn't bad, but Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon being on the top? Give me a break. | I like Ganondorf and am happy to know that some others agree with me when I say he isn't bad, but Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon being on the top? Give me a break. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:99.31.164.94|99.31.164.94]] ([[User talk:99.31.164.94|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/99.31.164.94|contribs]]) 07:35, 6 June 2009</small> | ||
Ganondorf number three in Bob Marley country? SWEET. [[User:DRTJR|DRTJR]] ([[User talk:DRTJR|talk]]) 19:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | Ganondorf number three in Bob Marley country? SWEET. [[User:DRTJR|DRTJR]] ([[User talk:DRTJR|talk]]) 19:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 313: | Line 306: | ||
==Why are there images instead of text?== | ==Why are there images instead of text?== | ||
Why are the character's images in the tier list? The page is better when the characters in the tier lists are in text. | Why are the character's images in the tier list? The page is better when the characters in the tier lists are in text. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Poodoas|Poodoas]] ([[User talk:Poodoas|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Poodoas|contribs]]) 21:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
:Ok | :Ok | ||
#They're changeable | #They're changeable | ||
| Line 320: | Line 313: | ||
:all three have been have been by [[User:DRTJR|DRTJR]] ([[User talk:DRTJR|talk]]) 22:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | :all three have been have been by [[User:DRTJR|DRTJR]] ([[User talk:DRTJR|talk]]) 22:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:#Ewww... Bad formatting - don't leave spaces at the start of lines, and if you want the whole of your comment to be indented, place : at the start of each new line. | :#Ewww... Bad formatting - don't leave spaces at the start of lines, and if you want the whole of your comment to be indented, place : at the start of each new line. | ||
:#If someone doesn't sign a comment, put <nowiki>{{unsigned|their username|time and date they posted the comment}}</nowiki> at the end of the comment. You can find out their username and the time and date from the [http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Tier_list&action=history page history]. | :#If someone doesn't sign a comment, put <nowiki>{{subst:unsigned|their username|time and date they posted the comment}}</nowiki> at the end of the comment. You can find out their username and the time and date from the [http://super-smash-bros.wikia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Tier_list&action=history page history]. | ||
:#I don't get how using pictures instead of text prevents people from changing the order in the tier list (especially seeing as the templates are protected). The change to pictures instead of text was made so that it looked more attractive. The text looked boring, whereas the pictures are vibrant and colourful. | :#I don't get how using pictures instead of text prevents people from changing the order in the tier list (especially seeing as the templates are protected). The change to pictures instead of text was made so that it looked more attractive. The text looked boring, whereas the pictures are vibrant and colourful. | ||
::'''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 22:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ::'''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 22:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 334: | Line 327: | ||
:Plus, stamina forces you to have to switch them out or suffer weaker attacks. Of course, you could always play [[Brawl+]]... [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 18:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | :Plus, stamina forces you to have to switch them out or suffer weaker attacks. Of course, you could always play [[Brawl+]]... [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 18:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
I personally think pokemon Trainer should be higher on the teir list, its probably just me but I like the versatility in attatck methods offered by the different pokemon. | |||
== Points on Brawl Tier list == | == Points on Brawl Tier list == | ||
| Line 388: | Line 383: | ||
== Olimar spelled wrong, links to wrong page. == | == Olimar spelled wrong, links to wrong page. == | ||
Can someone edit this? | Can someone edit this?<small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:71.103.43.235|71.103.43.235]] ([[User talk:71.103.43.235|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/71.103.43.235|contribs]]) </small> | ||
:The problem has been fixed. [[User:Y462|Y462]] <small>([[User talk:Y462|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Y462|C]] • [[Special:Editcount/Y462|E]] )</small> 23:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | :The problem has been fixed. [[User:Y462|Y462]] <small>([[User talk:Y462|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Y462|C]] • [[Special:Editcount/Y462|E]] )</small> 23:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 418: | Line 413: | ||
(12)Samus | (12)Samus | ||
*Pikachu is considered good enough to be in even a separate tier than fox. Pikachu is either placed in a separate tier or with Fox. | *Pikachu is considered good enough to be in even a separate tier than fox. Pikachu is either placed in a separate tier or with Fox. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:KoRoBeNiKi|KoRoBeNiKi]] ([[User talk:KoRoBeNiKi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/KoRoBeNiKi|contribs]]) </small> | ||
And your source is..? [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="khaki">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="khaki">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 00:19, September 30, 2009 (UTC) | And your source is..? [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="khaki">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="khaki">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 00:19, September 30, 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 440: | Line 435: | ||
Thanks guys, that makes sense. Its just that I expected him to be higher although he is already pretty high. | Thanks guys, that makes sense. Its just that I expected him to be higher although he is already pretty high. | ||
== Proposed movement of a link == | ==Proposed movement of a link== | ||
I think that the link to Semicolon's page shouldn't be in the Controversy on the Existence of Tiers section. I don't think an article should link to a page where a user thwarts a bunch of stupid arguments against tiers. Since it's only one user doing an examination and it isn't anything official it should either be moved to the see also section or simply removed. I do agree with what he is saying so I'm not suggesting this because I disagree with it. [[User:Tuth|<span style="color: blue;">Tuth the tough Mii</span>]] [[User talk:Tuth|''<span style="color: red;">You got owned!</span>'']] [[Special:Contributions/Tuth|''<span style="color: cyan;">Visit Mint Brick Wiki!</span>'']] | |||
:How about this: I don't care what the "vote" here is, I'm gonna do what I can to make sure it stays. We've had this discussion before. Also, I have no idea what "official" would mean in this context. I will say that it is about the most scientifically correct (in terms of the methodology and rhetoric) study on video games I have seen in a long time. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 15:40, October 26, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I understand that Semicolon's thing is legitimate. The only reason I want it moved is because it is a user page. I don't think it is right to put a link to a user page in an article. It should be moved to the see also section where it belongs. [[User:Tuth|<span style="color: blue;">Tuth the tough Mii</span>]] [[User talk:Tuth|''<span style="color: red;">You got owned!</span>'']] [[Special:Contributions/Tuth|''<span style="color: cyan;">Visit Mint Brick Wiki!</span>'']] | |||
:::The best place for the link is where it is at the moment - if you want to add ''another'' link to the page in the "See also" section, go ahead, but there should be a link to it at the top of the "Controversy of the Existence of Tiers" section no matter how many other links you provide on the page as the Treatise is all about the controversy of the existence of tiers, so the link belongs there. The fact that it's a subpage of Semicolon's user page is irrelevant - granted, it's not the sort of thing that should go in the mainspace as it's an essay written by a user, but it's a good enough essay that it can be linked to on relevant pages in the mainspace. If the essay was poorly written or just plain wrong, then this wouldn't be the case, and the link wouldn't be in the Tier list article, but it's well written and completely true, so it's okay to link to it. Also, this sort of thing doesn't require "Support" or "Oppose" sections - it's not a poll, it's a discussion. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 15:56, October 26, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::For what it's worth, I've long supported making the Treatise in the SmashWiki namespace and endorsed by the wiki, which would eliminate the issue of it being in the user namespace. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="orange"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="black">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="black">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 02:29, October 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::I'm with Miles. I don't find it very professional have that linked to a user page, but if it were an article, perhaps... '''[[User:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:purple;">Kperfekt</span>]]''' [[User talk:Kperfekt722|<span style="color:red;"><sup>BURN!!!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kperfekt722|<span style="color:yellow;"><sup>Revert That!</sup></span>]] 06:01, October 29, 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Ness dropped in the SSB tier list? == | |||
How could Ness drop so low in the ssb tier list? IMO Ness was a broken character. He had a deadly spike, good air game, powerful throws, good recovery, and his yo yo was really strong and had good reach! So why did he drop? | |||
:Well, ssb has only 12 characters which means that if the backroom finds one thing bad about Ness he drop quite a lot. Personally I'm really not sure. Don't get me wrong: I'm a huge Ness fan and was very surprised when he dropped to the second wort guy in the series. Hopefully he will rise again. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 05:28, November 15, 2009 (UTC) | |||
I'll explain. Ness does not have a good recovery. You can just grab the ledge. and when when he recovers, spike him, or you can jump into his pk thunder and gimp him. Rinse and repeat. The only character in smash 64 with a worse recovery (most likely) is Link. Ness is the only character in ssb outside of Link who basically dies whenever he goes offstage. Ness does have a good spike and a good throw but has a bad dash grab. His DJC's are really good as well. However, Ness doesn't have the range. Ness's become quite predictable. His up tilt (main combo starter) has too much lag. The Yo-Yo also has way too much lag to be too useful outside of edgeguarding. His only main saving point is that when he can actually get a combo starting, people usually die. He is also one of the best platform characters due to down air platform combos. He has enough priority to be some of the best of the low tier, but has horrible matchups vs Falcon, Pikachu, and others. --[[User:KoRoBeNiKi|KoRoBeNiKi]] ([[User talk:KoRoBeNiKi|talk]]) 19:17, November 15, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:But why did he drop? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 01:36, November 16, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Well, there's what KoRo said, and there's always the ever-so-unforgiving tourny results that could of been a big factor in his big drop. Sigh...sometimes I think these professionals never give enough time to aknowledge the potential in some characters...(Third best to third worst? O_o) <span style="font-family:Forte;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Reaper48</font>]][[User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<font color="purepurple"> >:D!!!</font>]]</span> 22:06, November 17, 2009 (UTC) | |||
There aren't that many tournies for smash 64 offline anymore. If there are, they are usually dominated by Fox's, Kirby, Pikachu, and Falcon. It is also dominated by region. For example, the best player on the East Coast offline is most likely Sensei, a Fox user, while the best player in Canada is SuperBoomFan, a Falcon user, and the best player in California (outside of Isai who uses everyone), is really tied between a Falcon user and a Fox/Pika user. These players dominate their area so much. --[[User:KoRoBeNiKi|KoRoBeNiKi]] ([[User talk:KoRoBeNiKi|talk]]) 00:42, November 18, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Uh, they obviously did use Ness a lot, seeing as how he was considered one of the best characters for so long. Ness got a fair chance. [[User:Capefeather|capefeather]] ([[User talk:Capefeather|talk]]) 03:57, December 19, 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Brawl Tiers, why the stupid naming? == | |||
Why use S, A, etc. this isnt sonic the hedgehog, this isnt street fighter. top, high, med/high, medium, med/low, low, bottom. its simple. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:DJLO|DJLO]] ([[User talk:DJLO|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DJLO|contribs]]) 05:20, November 17, 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
:With seven tiers, naming can get confusing (as you posted, there are two names with slashes), and we want to avoid extreme names like "god tier" because of the meaning they imply. I'm fine with the lettered naming, although I'd prefer not using S to start (I suppose they wanted the bottom named F or something). [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] <small><choose><option>eXemplary Logic</option><option>The Stats Guy</option><option>The Table Designer</option></choose></small> 14:22, November 17, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Maybe a Star tier or something and get a picture of a star in there. But then, we would have to change a lot too on other articles. ☆<span style="font-family:Algerian;">[[User:Solar Dragon|<font color="green">The</font> <font color="red">Solar</font> <font color="blue">Dragon</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Solar Dragon|<font color="gold">talk</font>]])</sup></span>☆ 22:13, November 17, 2009 (UTC) | |||
How many times must I say that it is in no way our call? This is what the SBR puts out, not what we think they should have put out. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 22:51, November 17, 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Tournaments== | |||
A few people have said that tournaments affect tiers. I thought it was the other way around. It says somewhere on the page that tournaments are a way to back up the tier list. Arn't tiers based solely of of matchups, and if so, shouldn't bowser be at the botton as he counters nobody? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 01:17, November 18, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Tiers are based off of tournament results. Matchups are not based on tiers, but they do sport a tier-matching pattern that is likely not coincidence. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] <small><choose><option>eXemplary Logic</option><option>The Stats Guy</option><option>The Table Designer</option></choose></small> 01:30, November 18, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::If that's the case, we should reword the page. Also, it says on Meta Knights page that the reason why he's number one is because he has the best matchups in the game. I thought tiers were a mixture of Matchps, Tournament results, Character metagames, and the Backroom's decision as a whole about each character. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 04:53, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::If he has the best match-ups, he will do well in tourneys. Yes, this is all a cycle. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 05:20, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::So tiers are purely based on tournament results? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 20:43, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
== I don't know about this... == | |||
If someone just got Brawl, and (s)he were to look online to see who the best character is on it, they would see Meta Knight as #1. Also, they would see characters such as Link and CF as bottom tier characters, ie. they stink. As a result of that, no one will use Link or CF, so the characters become unused, so there will be no new stradegies to use for Link ans CF. How can this be beneficial to competetive play? Eventually, everyone will just play as Meta Knight. After all, he ''is'' the best player in the game. | |||
Tounament play will become boring and confusing. People will undoubtably go insane from MK's repeated sound effects, sending said people into violent rampages, causing thousands of deaths across the globe. | |||
Actually, maybe not... BUT! I believe that displaying the ''complete'' tier will lead to the unuse of many characters. Displaying the top 10 in no particular order would be fine I think... | |||
P.S. I don't play as Link/CF/Meta Knight. I just used those names as examples | |||
[[Special:Contributions/67.142.130.19|67.142.130.19]] 16:51, November 20, 2009 (UTC) Lord Dragon | |||
:The recursive argument you speak of is mentioned [[User:Semicolon/Treatise_on_the_Existence_of_Tiers|here]]. Tl;dr: while it's possible the tier list affects itself recursively, there's no proof. Also, it should be mentioned that the tier list does not apply to new players, since it's based on tournament results. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] <small><choose><option>eXemplary Logic</option><option>The Stats Guy</option><option>The Table Designer</option></choose></small> 19:53, November 20, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Well, if a new person here were to see the article, they would of also read the top of the page- explaining how it works, and the treatise, too. Tournys are a major fact, yes, but your "Meta Knight will be the end of mankind" situation is exaggerated... and while I myself LOVE to exaggerate things beyond their meaning, your situation is definitly wrong- people will continue to use other characters. There are many anti-tier people who are pros with Link, Falcon, and others, fighting to get them to the top. The tier list has actually cause other people to choose characters OTHER than top tiers, don't you worry. Of course, though, who you choose to be your main shouldn't be based on who other people are good with, if that's also what you were saying. <span style="font-family:Forte;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Reaper48</font>]][[User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<font color="purepurple"> >:D!!!</font>]]</span> 19:55, November 20, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Actually Toomai, I think it's very applicable to new players. | |||
:::If a new player were to look at the tier list and the character matchup grid, they would see that characters such as Meta Knight have a clear advantage to many, if not all of the other characters in the game. | |||
:::For instance: Ganandorf has an average matchup of 25%; MK's average is 60%. <u>Clearly</u> MK is a 'better' character than Ganandorf. | |||
:::Why then, should a new player pick Ganandorf as their main? | |||
:::Suppose a new player were to chose Ganandorf (lets call him Player 1), and another player picks MK (lets call him Player 2), and they were to practice with these characters for a week against CPU Mario. Assuming both players became roughly 'just as good' as each other, if you were to put Player 1 against Player 2 (according to the tier list), Player 1 should get his butt handed to him on Galaxia. So then the Ganandorf player, realizing the horrible error he made in choosing to play as Ganandorf, switches to MK, leading to more MK players who thrash every other character in the game. You cannot say that this argument is not accurate for casual gameplay. The game is a contest. Everyone wants to win, even if that means playing with a character other than their favorate. | |||
:::I think that's it for Toomai. I wish (sincerely) to be proven wrong, but I don't see it. | |||
:::And HavocReaper, you said, 'There are many anti-tier people who are pros with Link, Falcon, and others, fighting to get them to the top. The tier list has actually cause other people to choose characters OTHER than top tiers, don't you worry.' | |||
:::I actually sorta agree with you. Although for every person who chooses Link because he's low on the list, how many people choose MK because he's #1? | |||
:::Theoretically, fewer people play as Link because the tier list says he stinks. If the tier list and character matchup grid were to be removed, there would be nothing saying that Link sucks, so therefore, more players would play as him and, as a result, Link's fighting style will evolve to a point when a matchup against MK could be considered almost even. Unless of course MK would still be far superior than every character in the game. Then he would probably need to be banned. | |||
:::Wow that was long. [[Special:Contributions/67.142.130.19|67.142.130.19]] 01:16, November 21, 2009 (UTC)Lord Dragon | |||
::::The point of this wiki is to report on what is. I don't care what you think should be, or how you think what is might impact other things. If it is, it is, and the tier list is. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 01:32, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::When I say the tier list doesn't apply to new players, I mean that the metagame is completely different. New players will not be doing any of the advanced techniques or mindgames that can define certain characters' positions (such as chaingrabs for Dedede and the Ice Climbers), and the mistakes they are likely to make (simply by being novices) significantly evens out any matchup. Maybe a tier list of the novice metagame will still have Meta Knight at the top, but it won't be because the tournament tier list does. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px]] <small><choose><option>eXemplary Logic</option><option>The Stats Guy</option><option>The Table Designer</option></choose></small> 03:30, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::Story time! :D! So, just yesterday, RAN1 and I were brawling on wifi, right? In one match, I just happened to choose Ganon and he was MK. Guess who won? I did, of course, and you wanna know why? Because I'm have more experience with Ganon than RAN1 has with MK. Matchups did say the opposite, yes, but don't forget about the experience each player has, first. I had also beat him as C.F. against his awsome Falco, too. I didn't win every single match, of course, but it seems Experience>Tier List. <span style="font-family:Forte;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Reaper48</font>]][[User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<font color="purepurple"> >:D!!!</font>]]</span> 15:20, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Skill > mindgames/personal playstyle > matchups > tiers. Well known facts. [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="orange"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="saddlebrown">([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|<font color="saddlebrown">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 22:53, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::So then, HavocReaper, wouldn't it be plausible to assume that the tier is just garbage? According to you, It doesn't mean anything. Meta Knight is #1 because the guy who plays as him is awesome at the game. Couldn't the player have just as easily gotten just as good with CF? I understand that some characters just stink (Pichu in ssb:m, I think), but how could 1 char. be considered 'the best' just because he's someone's personal preference? [[Special:Contributions/67.142.130.19|67.142.130.19]] 02:52, November 22, 2009 (UTC)Lord Dragon | |||
::::::::Notrly. Clearly you didn't read the top of the article, as I said- it's based on how well the char.s are expected to play in tournys. It's based on metagame, yes, though a skill indifference could mean win or lose in any battle, not just in smash bros., but in EVERY single multiplayer game on the planet. (Think about it...) It's based on how far they've gone into making strageties angainst other fighters and on general matchups. Oh, and DO NAWT SAY PICHU SUX. HE IZ SO GOOD, HE FEELS YOUR PAIN. And another thing...whenever people adress me, it's always Havoc or HavocReaper. Never HavocReaper48, no...0_o. <span style="font-family:Forte;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="brown">Reaper48</font>]][[User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<font color="purepurple"> >:D!!!</font>]]</span> 04:10, November 22, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::OK. I think I got it now. Essentially then, the tier list doesn't do anything, it's just a record of how things have turned out and, given a continuing trend, how things are likely turn out. Skill and experience will almost always decide the game, but can be assumed to be affected by the tier. If thats it then... erm, thank you ToomaiGlittershine, Miles, and HavocReaper48 for clearing this up for me. [[Special:Contributions/67.142.130.19|67.142.130.19]] 13:32, November 22, 2009 (UTC)Lord Dragon | |||
::::::::::Actually, tiers have their uses. For example, if Bob wanted to prove to himself that he was better than Jerry, he could play as Ganondorf and Jerry could play as MK. If Bob won ten times in a row, that would prove he is better. There's other uses, like training for tournaments, but as Havoc said, skill matters more. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 18:10, November 22, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Well this actually isn't true anonymous contributor. If one of the person's mains Ganondorf and the other person does not main Metaknight, then this does not work. Tier lists are compared for people who are both equally high skilled. It does not really say who automatically wins vs who but more says that there is more of a chance that one character will win over another. Tier lists do not say who will actually win, more of an indication of who has the higher chance. --[[User:KoRoBeNiKi|KoRoBeNiKi]] ([[User talk:KoRoBeNiKi|talk]]) 14:35, December 3, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::Mk vs Ganon was a bad example. How about Olimar vs Ganon? It's almost impossible for the ganon player to win, and if a person isn't able to beat Ganon with Olimar at least once in say, 10 matches, than that proves that the Ganon player is better. Tiers do not determine matchups, they just are usefull for training. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 06:02, December 19, 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Zelda/Sheik== | |||
Why aren't they considered one person? If tiers are about potential, then whenever Zelda seems to be a better character for the battle the player can change to her, and same with Sheik. I know this is not the wiki's decision, but if you know the reason then tell me please. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 20:57, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Most professionals use either one or the other. It is possible to be Zelda the whole match, or vice versa. There is not a sufficent amount of players in the professional scene that use on or the other in order to make a noticeable impact on the tier list, so they are considered separate.'''[[User:Smorekingxg456|<span style="color:#5F9EA0">Smoreking</span>]]<small><sup>[[User Talk:Smorekingxg456#Top|<span style="color:#00FF00">(T)</span>]]</sup></small><small><sub> [[Special:Contributions/Smorekingxg456|(c)]]</sub></small>''' 21:24, November 21, 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Lucas bumping == | |||
I | I kind of agree that lucas is a lot better if your looking at a non item fight. | ||
I mean he has a great advantage over plenty of characters if someone was to get | |||
good with him like I did. pk magnet cancels just about all physical attacks. | |||
zap jumping is great recovery, pk fire can be great for spacing opponents. | |||
and pk thunder makes for taking out many characters such as (Ike,DeDeDe,Falco, | |||
Olimar,Diddy Kong,Link,Toon Link) and many more. While I agree the up smash | |||
should probably never be used, the down smash is great for killing tether recoverers | |||
and people who love to roll. As far as infinite chain grabbing goes, that is one | |||
character(marth)and at low damage, it is possible to break out of that to about 40% | |||
:Did you know that Ness counters him? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 03:20, November 30, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::If you want to start a discussion like this, take it to the [[Forum:Index|forums]]. For more interesting arguments over the tier list, see [http://www.smashboards.com/ SmashBoards]. They often have complex debates like this over there, and it's quite an interesting site. '''[[User:RAN1|<font color="darkred">R</font>]][[User talk:RAN1|<font color="navy">A</font>]][[Special:Contributions/RAN1|<font color="darkgreen">N</font>]]1''' 03:27, November 30, 2009 (UTC) | |||
= | ==Update== | ||
When will the tier list update? It's one of the most important things in smash. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 22:57, December 5, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Take is up with the back room. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 23:04, December 5, 2009 (UTC) | |||
= | ==Bowser== | ||
He has worse matchups than even Jiggly. Why is he not in bottom tier? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 23:33, December 6, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Well, (Prepare to see 10 people respond to this, btw...), Bowser has placed better in tournaments and is an overall better character based on his metagame when compared to Jiggzzz. Matchups do not affect the tier list that much to be honest... (Link has a 50-50 against Snake, I think, and he's bottom tier.) <span style="font-family:Harlow Solid Italic;">[[User:HavocReaper48|<font color="DARKBLUE">Havoc</font>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<font color="DARKBLUE">Reaper</font>]][[User:HavocReaper48/Emoticonology|<span style='color="CYAN"'>48</span>]]</span> 00:02, December 7, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Well, Link has one or two counters or even mathups but over all they are bad. Bowser counters only CF and Ganondorf. Also, there's a new forum on SWF that shows a ranking of tournament characters and Bowser, along with Jiggly, is on the "never used" ranking. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 00:23, December 7, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Read the top of the page. Or if you're too lazy to just don't post on this page again. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 01:16, December 7, 2009 (UTC) | |||
= | ==Master Hand== | ||
As an officially playable character, I believe Master Hand deserves a spot on the Melee tier list right below Pichu, opinions? | |||
He is easily the worst character because of his laggy, predictable moves and inability to dodge anything. All of his macthups are 0-100 in the other player's favour. He is current;y the only playable character (excluding AR characters) who isn't on the tier list as well. [[User:Lord-Sunday|Lord-Sunday]] ([[User talk:Lord-Sunday|talk]]) 06:32, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Tiers are based on tourney conditions. You can't play as master hand in tourneys. And actually, he would be at number one as when you play as him he can't be Koed. Also, sign your comments with four of these: ~. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 06:42, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Sorry to tell you this mate, but there is no rule to say that you can't play as him in tourneys. And he wouldn't be at number one, anyone who can't dodge his attacks for 8 minutes and win by percentage should quit smash bros. now. Oh and sorry about the signing. [[User:Lord-Sunday|Lord-Sunday]] ([[User talk:Lord-Sunday|talk]]) 07:39, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
= | :"As an officially playable character": though it may only be the very start of your argument, it is in fact the point at which your argument falls down, as Master Hand isn't "officially playable" - he's a glitch character, so he's not legally playable in tournaments, so he does not deserve a place on any tier list. Even if he did, we wouldn't be the ones to decide - that's the job of the [[Smash Back Room]] on [[SmashBoards]]. '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 09:11, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I guess if glitches aren't allowed, we'll all have to stop Wavedashing, L-Cancelling, etc., then. Unless he is explicitly banned by a rule (which he isn't) then he is allowed. For more information, please check the "Tournament Legal" page. [[User:Lord-Sunday|Lord-Sunday]] ([[User talk:Lord-Sunday|talk]]) 09:14, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Okay, let me put it this way: we can do '''''nothing''''' about the tier lists - we may publish them, but we have no say in their creation - so, if you really feel strongly about this, I suggest you go to Smash World Forums and try to find someone who ''can'' do something about the tier lists. Good luck, '''''<span style="font-family:Arial;">[[User:PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Penguin</font>]][[User talk:PenguinofDeath|<font color="gray">of</font>]][[Special:Contributions/PenguinofDeath|<font color="silver">Death</font>]]</span>''''' 10:28, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Thinks Master Hand should be be on the tier list (You mean...100-0 matchups :D), thinks L-cancellnig and wavedashing are glitches...oh hello troll. --[[User:KoRoBeNiKi|KoRoBeNiKi]] ([[User talk:KoRoBeNiKi|talk]]) 20:21, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::Oh, by the way, Master hand may seem like an easy boss, but if he were controlled by a human, he would own. All of his attacks can kill you, are very hard to predict, and can be guided. Furthermore, he can't be KOed. Most projectiles fire too low for him so you have to get close to him, which will make you a sitting duck. L-cancelling and wavedashing are '''not''' glitches; see their respective pages. Finally, as many above have stated, we cannot do '''anything''' about tiers. You'll have to go all the way to SWF and tell them, and good luck convincing them to put master hand on the tier list :D. [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 20:49, December 27, 2009 (UTC) | |||