Talk:Shulk (SSB4): Difference between revisions

 
(25 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


Shouldn't we have a page for Metal Face? He was hinted to be a stage boss in his trailer. --[[Special:Contributions/73.160.5.100|73.160.5.100]] 15:43, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
Shouldn't we have a page for Metal Face? He was hinted to be a stage boss in his trailer. --[[Special:Contributions/73.160.5.100|73.160.5.100]] 15:43, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
This is a minor suggestion, but under the Trivia section for Shulk, it mentions his swimtrunks alt costume, but it is written as "swintrunks". [[User:ShrekTheOgre|ShrekTheOgre]] ([[User talk:ShrekTheOgre|talk]]) 01:11, 18 June 2015 (EDT)


== Third-Party? ==
== Third-Party? ==
Line 13: Line 15:


Let's just say it's 2nd party. --[[User:Bob8644|Bob8644]] ([[User talk:Bob8644|talk]]) 17:05, 2 September 2014 (EDT)
Let's just say it's 2nd party. --[[User:Bob8644|Bob8644]] ([[User talk:Bob8644|talk]]) 17:05, 2 September 2014 (EDT)
==Page Simplification==
While I was going on my daily check of the wiki, I went to Shulk's page. It was, to be blunt, a Great Wall of Text. I know someone else already added the tag, but I sincerely doubt ANYBODY is going to willfully read the whole page. I'm all for descriptive pages, but in this case, I think Shulk's entire page was a bit ''too'' meaty. [[User: TitaniumX|TitaniumX]] ([[User talk:TitaniumX|talk]]) 18:05, 7 October 2015 (EDT)


== Air Slash ==
== Air Slash ==
Line 56: Line 62:
:::::No, because in the completed title screen, Nintendo gives CLEAR attribution to Monolith for the character. As such, Nintendo don't strictly own all the Copyright as their own entity (Ownership by proxy, in a way). Because of that, calling him Nintendo character isn't... accurate. And, as Miles said, it's not really notable. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 12:51, 8 April 2015 (EDT)
:::::No, because in the completed title screen, Nintendo gives CLEAR attribution to Monolith for the character. As such, Nintendo don't strictly own all the Copyright as their own entity (Ownership by proxy, in a way). Because of that, calling him Nintendo character isn't... accurate. And, as Miles said, it's not really notable. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 12:51, 8 April 2015 (EDT)
:::::And on this note, can we make the ignorance of hidden notices a third-time blockable offence now? It's getting ridiculous. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 13:15, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
:::::And on this note, can we make the ignorance of hidden notices a third-time blockable offence now? It's getting ridiculous. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 13:15, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
::::::[[wikipedia:Phoenix Wright|The defense]] has no objections. [[File:Aidanzapunksignature.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: blue;">'''Master of Speed and Aura'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]] 13:17, 4 May 2015 (EDT)
Oh my god, just call him a Nintendo character, it's not that hard, PXZ2 even says it's a franchise from Nintendo. [[User:Nintenzilla|Nintenzilla]] ([[User talk:Nintenzilla|talk]]) 19:51, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
:Actually, PXZ2 uses the same copyrights for Xenoblade (Nintendo/Monolith Soft) and Fire Emblem (Nintendo/Intelligent Systems) as Smash does. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 19:55, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
:True. But it is worthy to note that Ninty has at least 96% stock in Monolith. Also, to my knowledge, Nintendo doesn't even own HAL Labs or Game Freak. There is nothing wrong calling Shulk a Nintendo character. Interesting to note Miles' possible change of mind when comparing what he's said a few posts up with [[User talk:Miles_of_SmashWiki#This_person.|this]] here. Anyways, I think the trivia point is unnecessary, and problematic.  '''''[[User:Aardvarkian|<span style="color:purple;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">Aardvarkian</span>]]''''' <span style="color:blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">'''''[[User Talk:Aardvarkian|(Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aardvarkian|Contributions)]]''''' </span> 20:03, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
How about we just keep the first couple of sentences? I mean, we don't talk about people who think Link's name is Zelda. [[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: blue">'''Nyargle'''</span><span style="color: orange">'''blargle'''</span>]] Let's go Mets! ([[User talk:Nyargleblargle|Talk]]<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 20:07, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
We should just remove it altogether. Why should we cover trivial misconceptions made by people? '''''[[User:Aardvarkian|<span style="color:purple;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">Aardvarkian</span>]]''''' <span style="color:blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">'''''[[User Talk:Aardvarkian|(Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aardvarkian|Contributions)]]''''' </span> 20:10, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
It's not a funny or even common misconception, for the matter... '''''[[User:Aardvarkian|<span style="color:purple;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">Aardvarkian</span>]]''''' <span style="color:blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">'''''[[User Talk:Aardvarkian|(Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aardvarkian|Contributions)]]''''' </span> 20:20, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
:It actually kind of was common. I mean, he was placed before Pac-Man in the game and a lot of promotional work for the game, and [[#Third-Party?|there was even a discussion here about it]]. [[File:Aidanzapunksignature.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: black;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: orange">'''Master of Speed and Aura'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkSignaturesmall.PNG]] 20:29, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
::Yeah, there was speculation, but just because there was some here and elsewhere on the Internet doesn't mean it's common. '''''[[User:Aardvarkian|<span style="color:purple;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">Aardvarkian</span>]]''''' <span style="color:blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">'''''[[User Talk:Aardvarkian|(Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aardvarkian|Contributions)]]''''' </span> 20:32, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
:::Miles, Miles, Miles, they flat-out categorize Xenoblade (Along with Fire Emblem) as "Franchises from Nintendo", however this issue is so unessary and so uneeded that we should just remove it all together. [[User:Nintenzilla|Nintenzilla]] ([[User talk:Nintenzilla|talk]]) 21:20, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
::::You're being rather condescending, and you're not correct. A brief look at the game's official site [http://pxz2.bn-ent.net/ shows the copyrights I mentioned]. Anyways, this trivia point is fine as-is. It was a misconception I saw a lot for a while, and the trivia point would be fine if people would do their research before blindly trying to change it. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 21:25, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
I was talking about the trailer, and I think that we should remove it as it's conclusive and subjective, so I say it be removed before it causes anymore controversy. [[User:Nintenzilla|Nintenzilla]] ([[User talk:Nintenzilla|talk]]) 21:41, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
:Okay, I added something that I hope is a fair compromise. [[User:Nintenzilla|Nintenzilla]] ([[User talk:Nintenzilla|talk]]) 21:46, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
:I think I could do better...I'll take a crack at it. I still think it should go, though. '''''[[User:Aardvarkian|<span style="color:purple;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">Aardvarkian</span>]]''''' <span style="color:blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px">'''''[[User Talk:Aardvarkian|(Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aardvarkian|Contributions)]]''''' </span> 22:10, 27 October 2015 (EDT)
== Inability to auto-cancel? ==
Is Shulk the only character who cannot autocancel ''any'' of his aerial attacks? I've mained and played Shulk ever since the beginning of ''Smash 4'' but I'm still unsure of this, although Shulk is pretty infamous for having landing lag for everything. [[User:Archrelico|Archrelico]] ([[User talk:Archrelico|talk]]) 06:03, 12 January 2016 (EST)
:He is. Every other character has at least one aerial that can autocancel before being interruptible. Even Rosalina. [[User:Drill Blaster Mark 2|<font color="Brown">'''Drill Blaster'''</font> <font color="Pink">'''Mark'''</font> <font color="Silver">'''2'''</font>]] ''[[User talk:Drill Blaster Mark 2|<font color="Purple">(talk)</font>]]'' 06:43, 12 January 2016 (EST)
::Well jesus, I guess I'm maining a really sluggish british person then. [[User:Archrelico|Archrelico]] ([[User talk:Archrelico|talk]]) 06:49, 12 January 2016 (EST)
:::This reminds me - isn't Shulk the only character whose aerials are interruptible ''before'' the autocancel? If he does a full hop back air and just lands, he gets 19 frames of landing lag [http://www.kuroganehammer.com/Smash4/Shulk (here's his frame data)]. But he can avoid that lag by double jumping just before he hits the ground, or mitigate it by starting a neutral air to get that move's 10 frames of lag instead. I believe this is unique to him. It ought to be in the article somewhere. [[File:Zyrac sig.png]] <font face="Lucida Console">[[User:Zyrac|<font color="green">'''Zyrac'''</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Zyrac|<font color="green">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Zyrac|<font color="green">contribs</font>]])</small></font> 06:51, 12 January 2016 (EST)
:::That's what I said. It also makes him take the landing lag of whatever was used to interrupt his aerial, just like you said. If he double jumps and lands, he takes 4 frames, for example. If you want to put it in, go for the Trivia section. I'm pretty sure no one will disagree with that. [[User:Drill Blaster Mark 2|<font color="Brown">'''Drill Blaster'''</font> <font color="Pink">'''Mark'''</font> <font color="Silver">'''2'''</font>]] ''[[User talk:Drill Blaster Mark 2|<font color="Purple">(talk)</font>]]'' 07:05, 12 January 2016 (EST)
::::I'm doing that right now. Just let me find out how to phrase this. [[User:Archrelico|Archrelico]] ([[User talk:Archrelico|talk]]) 07:07, 12 January 2016 (EST)
::::I wouldn't call it trivia, though. Seems like helpful information for playing the character. [[File:Zyrac sig.png]] <font face="Lucida Console">[[User:Zyrac|<font color="green">'''Zyrac'''</font>]]<small>([[User talk:Zyrac|<font color="green">talk</font>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Zyrac|<font color="green">contribs</font>]])</small></font> 07:27, 12 January 2016 (EST)
According to Kurogane Hammer, Shulk's aerials technically autocancel, but it's rendered useless since they only do so after the FAF. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 07:15, 12 January 2016 (EST)
To clarify, is he the only fighter in the ''Smash Bros.'' series who cannot autocancel all aerials? Even Little Mac has that ability. [[User:Archrelico|Archrelico]] ([[User talk:Archrelico|talk]]) 07:37, 12 January 2016 (EST)
6,712

edits