SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/VinLAURiA: Difference between revisions

#'''Oppose'''. I really don't see you in too many disputes, and well... you lack the proper judgement skill. I don't think you would benefit from gaining admin powers; as Miles is saying, you jump the gun on decisions quite often. <font face="sand">''[[User:Qwerty|<font color="black">Qw</font><font color="003F3F">er</font><font color="005F5F">ty</font>]] ''[[User talk:Qwerty|<font color="005F6F">(t</font><font color="003C6F">al</font><font color="000F7F">k)</font>]]</font> 16:31, 22 November 2014 (EST)

#:What about junior adminship then, if that policy gets passed? (This is directed towards both of you.) [[Image:VinSymbol.png|16px|link=User:VinLAURiA]][[User:VinLAURiA|VinLAURiA]] ([[User talk:VinLAURiA|talk]]) 17:43, 22 November 2014 (EST)

#::'''"While it is not required, a nomination will probably only be passed if the nominee is a rollbacker with good community standing."''' -''[[SmashWiki:Junior administrators]]''

#::I feel you wouldn't be the best fit for JA, as you don't have rollback and your community standing is a little questionable, to be honest. While that's not required, it does hinder the possibly of a RfJA passing for you. <font face="Marker Felt">[[User:Rtzxy|<span style="color:red;">Rtzxy</span>]] [[File:Reflect.jpg|20x20px]] [[User talk:Rtzxy|<span style="color:green;">''Reflect!''</span>]]</font> 14:50, 29 November 2014 (EST)

#::::The two examples MarioIsTheBest gave kind of hurts your credibility a little, to be honest. Besides, not having rollback is enough to hinder your chances at passing a RfJA. <font face="Marker Felt">[[User:Rtzxy|<span style="color:red;">Rtzxy</span>]] [[File:Reflect.jpg|20x20px]] [[User talk:Rtzxy|<span style="color:green;">''Reflect!''</span>]]</font> 14:59, 29 November 2014 (EST)

#:::::Aww. I only did those two as a joke since the 3DS version was about to launch in Japan and I was excited... [[Image:VinSymbol.png|16px|link=User:VinLAURiA]][[User:VinLAURiA|VinLAURiA]] ([[User talk:VinLAURiA|talk]]) 15:11, 29 November 2014 (EST)

#'''Oppose'''. Someone who can't even follow the rules to begin with definitely should not be an admin.

#:take a look at some of his/her edits here: http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Template:WikiStatusValue&diff=576105&oldid=575750, http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Template:WikiStatusValue&diff=576127&oldid=576124, and there are more questionable actions that this user has done.  [[User:MarioIsTheBest|MarioIsTheBest]] ([[User talk:MarioIsTheBest|talk]]) 08:50, 28 November 2014 (EST)

#'''Oppose''' You haven't shown that you can handle disputes and I don't see why you need admin tools. [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 13:32, 28 November 2014 (EST)

#'''Strong Oppose''' - Your reasons for wanting adminship aren't very strong. Admins may just be regular users with additional tools, but they hold great responsibility, and simply wanting said tools to have easier access to clean-up on a handful of locked pages doesn't demonstrate that you understand responsibility (your mention of "preferring" becoming a junior admin also shows that you don't even want to have that responsibility.) You have also not shown good experience in dispute handling. Finally, I feel like your opposition to competitive gaming, which indicates both close-mindedness and ignorance, will prevent you from making unbiased decisions concerning coverage of competitive topics on the wiki, or settle user disputes that arise because of that issue. [[Talk:Main_Page/Archive_7#Smashers|This]] is an example where you argue in favor of removing the entire Smasher namespace, a crucial part of the wiki, without knowing how these players have contributed to the growth of the ''Smash'' series. --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 21:42, 28 November 2014 (EST)