6,207
edits
Forum:MLG affiliation: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
As everyone else said, that sounds great, but we need more details. Very promising for an increase in traffic and appearing more refined, but if they start trying to take jurisdiction over content on pages that doesn't align with their agenda, then that sounds pretty balls. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 15:58, 3 June 2014 (EDT) | As everyone else said, that sounds great, but we need more details. Very promising for an increase in traffic and appearing more refined, but if they start trying to take jurisdiction over content on pages that doesn't align with their agenda, then that sounds pretty balls. [[User:Ryxis|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis|talk]]) 15:58, 3 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
Maybe I'm just reading too deeply into this and/or I'm being too paranoid, but the fact that this email provides very little information outside of claiming it will help us leads me to believe something is amiss. I say we get as much information as possible before humouring the idea of affiliation. | |||
--- <font face="Pristina"><font size="3">''[[User:Monsieur Crow|Monsieur]] [[User_talk:Monsieur Crow|Crow]], Author Extraordinaire''</font></font>, 16:02, 3 June 2014 (EDT) | |||