Forum:Full Roster Thoughts: Difference between revisions

Forum:Full Roster Thoughts (edit)

Revision as of 18:08, September 11, 2014

628 bytes added , 9 years ago

no edit summary

Miles of SmashWiki

Administrators

26,488

edits

Revision as of 17:56, September 11, 2014 (edit) Scr7 (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:08, September 11, 2014 (edit) (undo) Miles of SmashWiki (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	My biased opinion is this: Brawl made 4 cuts (if you consider Young Link and Toon Link equivalent). SSB4 made 7 cuts (or 5 depending how you count PT), plus leaving 3 of Brawl's cuts alone, for a total of 10 no-shows. 10 no-shows in 60 characters is rather depressing. [[User:Toomai\|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai\|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png\|20px\|link=User:Toomai/Bin\|???]] The Yellow 17:37, 11 September 2014 (EDT)		My biased opinion is this: Brawl made 4 cuts (if you consider Young Link and Toon Link equivalent). SSB4 made 7 cuts (or 5 depending how you count PT), plus leaving 3 of Brawl's cuts alone, for a total of 10 no-shows. 10 no-shows in 60 characters is rather depressing. [[User:Toomai\|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai\|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png\|20px\|link=User:Toomai/Bin\|???]] The Yellow 17:37, 11 September 2014 (EDT)

			Snake was an understandable cut, given licensing reasons. Squirtle and Ivysaur are understandable cuts, given the removal of transformation and the desire not to overdose on Pokemon. Lucas, Wolf, and Ice Climbers are baffling. Especially odd is that we get three very obvious clones... but they're all from series which were getting newcomers anyway. I guess I just don't get it. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki\|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki\|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 18:08, 11 September 2014 (EDT)