122
edits
Forum:Fanon namespace: Difference between revisions
m
Always some dumbass mistake -_-
No edit summary |
m (Always some dumbass mistake -_-) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::'''Massive oppose.''' I don't think it is necessary in the slightest, and would serve as a major distraction from other things we could be improving. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 14:34, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | ::'''Massive oppose.''' I don't think it is necessary in the slightest, and would serve as a major distraction from other things we could be improving. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 14:34, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
:'''Oppose'''. While an interesting concept, I feel that the guidelines on fanon would be very difficult to precisely define. After all, Super Smash Flash had an article on the Wikia, and that was based on its popularity, which by itself is difficult to define. ''[[User:ReiDemon|Rei]]'''''[[User_talk:ReiDemon|Demon]]''' 15:38, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | :'''Oppose'''. While an interesting concept, I feel that the guidelines on fanon would be very difficult to precisely define. After all, Super Smash Flash had an article on the Wikia, and that was based on its popularity, which by itself is difficult to define. ''[[User:ReiDemon|Rei]]'''''[[User_talk:ReiDemon|Demon]]''' 15:38, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
::I'm not very sure about this idea. [[User:.....|.....]] [[User talk:.....|Trading]] [[Special:Contributions/.....|card game]] [[File:FalcoHeadSSBB.png|19px]] 18:15, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
'''Oppose that is OVER 9000!''': I remember all pages but Smash Flash being deleted on SmashWikia, and that wasn't very fair imo. I'm also pretty opposed to Fanon except for outside the mainspace. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]][[File:RoyHeadSSBM.png|20px]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 18:27, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
This isn't that bad an idea in the short run, but once it gets underway we'll be back dealing with undefinable and unprovable notability. '''Oppose'''. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Obfuscating 18:38, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
Exactly what about this makes it a good idea? You think we would want the type of user who is only interested in creating fanon and has no desire to improve the rest of the wiki? The regulation would most likely be ignored, and we'd have to go and revert all of the unnecessary crap. This would cause more harm than good. If we want to do fanon, we should make a fanon wiki. <font face="Triforce">[[User:Dr. Pain 99|<font color="purple">Dokteur</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Dr. Pain 99|<font color="purple">Pain99</font>]]</font> 18:46, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
:The idea was it would draw in those users, who would then take an interest in other areas of the Wiki. Inevitably, there would be users only interested in the fanon, but that would be outweighed by the activity increase and those who came for fanon that did took an interest in the rest of the Wiki. | |||
:Anyway, I'm growing more opposed to this idea rather than neutral, but it was worth throwing it out there to see what everyone else thought. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 19:02, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
Yeah we have to be really careful about Fanon. <s>Just look at the other wiki</s> . If we allow some fanon, the lines about what fanon is "notable" becomes hazy, and we end up attracting tons of unwanted contributers. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:MatchupUnknown.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 20:06, 17 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
'''Oppose'''. While it could work, it'd take a lot of work just to get a bunch of stubs prepared, and then if any details on SSB4 are revealed, there'd be clashing between edits relating to that and fanon based edits. Perhaps one big article on particularly notable fanon like Super Smash Flash and Smashtasm, featuring a short paragraph and a link for each sub-section, but we needn't waste our time filling up a whole article on Super Smash Sisters II. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">'''Toast'''</font><font color="maroon">'''Ultimatum'''</font>]] [[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|''<span style="color: silver;">'''Complaints Box'''</span>'']] 06:12, 18 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
I'll be closing this as '''failed'''. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[Image: TyranitarMS.png ]] 12:15, 19 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
Hmmmmm..... This idea of yours gvies me a better idea. >=) I'll have to work on it though [[File:SlitherxSig.png|link=User:Slitherx]] <small>([[User talk:Slitherx|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Slitherx|C]] )</small> --"Don't give me mercy." - Qu&Wow from Slitherx 18:54, 19 October 2011 (EDT) | |||