1,911
edits
(→Support: I think this is actually a very good idea despite mixed reactions. If anything Aidan could possibly be a more helpful admin than Nyargle (that's a bit of a stretch, but you never know).) |
EndGenuity (talk | contribs) (I agree that the recent vandalism is getting obnoxious, but increasing the number of active admins is not going to help, because the vandals can also increase in number.) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
#'''Slight oppose'''. While I believe you'd probably make a decent admin, I don't see a lot of things based on the application. You're a good contributor however without a doubt, just I don't see where you can do better over others. [[User:F0rZ3r0F0r|F0rZ3r0F0r]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0F0r|talk]]) 01:10, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Slight oppose'''. While I believe you'd probably make a decent admin, I don't see a lot of things based on the application. You're a good contributor however without a doubt, just I don't see where you can do better over others. [[User:F0rZ3r0F0r|F0rZ3r0F0r]] ([[User talk:F0rZ3r0F0r|talk]]) 01:10, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
#'''Moderate oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:51, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Moderate oppose'''. To be honest, I'm pretty questionable in your wiki handling skills, as I looked up everyone's opinion and there are slews of flaws you have. Your reasons to become an admin seems to be a lackluster, which it doesn't look good. That gives me a bad picture about how you would do with admin power. Should I trust you to become an admin? No thanks. I suggest you do RFA later in few months or more once you have to correct your core problems including some half of your disputes. [[User:Luigi540|Luigi540]] ([[User talk:Luigi540|talk]]) 01:51, 22 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
#Sure the recent fuck-load of vandalism is a growing and very nettling problem but that doesn't justify why ''you'' specifically should get adminship over everyone else. You're active a lot? Not a very good argument in my book. OT at the time of his RfA was very active but now he hasn't contributed in a month, and now he doesn't see anytime that he can be as active as he once was. Dispute handling? I'm looking at the argument on [[Talk:Tier list/Archive 7]] and it seems you let your emotions get the best of you. It's an admirable effort, but I don't think it qualifies as good dispute handling. As Toomai said, this seems like a rushed opportunity for you to obtain adminship in light of the recent vandalism. More than sufficient proof is the fact that you didn't even sign your RfA.<br>Overall, it seems you offer next to nothing over other candidates, and for that I '''strongly oppose''' you getting adminship. - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 10:08, 23 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||
#'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT) | #'''Neutral''' Normally this wiki wants admins who can handle user disputes, and I don't think user handling records are necessary to become a sysop. That should be a job for Bureaucrats. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is made in America 13:26, 20 October 2015 (EDT) |
edits