Talk:Tier list/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (Reverted edits by 75.1.161.132 (Talk); changed back to last version by Sky2042)
No edit summary
Line 139: Line 139:


::::::Last, but not least, the point of the article is not advertisement. It is about what is perceived to be the order of the characters in ability at a level at which not many people will ever achieve. Funny you should mention advertising; am I blind, or is there an advertisement above where I'm posting? --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 03:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
::::::Last, but not least, the point of the article is not advertisement. It is about what is perceived to be the order of the characters in ability at a level at which not many people will ever achieve. Funny you should mention advertising; am I blind, or is there an advertisement above where I'm posting? --[[User:Sky2042|Sky]] ([[User talk:Sky2042|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Sky2042|c]] · [[w:c:wow:User:Sky2042|w]]) 03:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
== Peach Ranked 5th? ==
I don't think Peach should be anywhere near the top of the tier list. Most of her moves are weak, her floats are only good for horizontal recovery, and her down smash is highly overrated. She's definitely a low tier character in my opinion. Anyone else agree?
-GalaxiaD,5:14 PM, April 14, 2008
Anonymous user